Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Frank Pearce, William chambliss, larueen snider, David gordon - Coggle…
Frank Pearce
argues that many laws which appear to benefit only the subject class in reality benefit the ruling class aswell.
claims that if violation of laws such as anti trust legislation are widspread yet the numbers of prosecution are small then prosecution must serve a purpose other than the regulation of business.
considers the relationship between the ruling class and organised crime has been encouraged ignored or repressed in direct relationship to its utility to the american ruling class.
during 1930s the Detroit automobile companies fought a long battle in trying to stop unions from forming,.
pearce sees organised gram as the servant of the ruling class, to be used when and where it suits its purpose
a second reason for the small number of prosecutions is to create the impressionist corporate crime in minimal. revelation of the widespread nature of corporations crime could well threaten capitalist power.
-
-
-
-
William chambliss
money ,power and influence do not get arrested, they avoid it
-
-
syndicate in seattle ,conceal all there crimes with money
-
-
larueen snider
notes that the capitalist state is often reluctant to pass laws which refulate large capitalist concern and which might threaten their profitability
she points out that capitalists states often use vast sums of money trying to attract investment froim corportations. they offer new investments tax concessions, cheap loans and grants, and build expensive infrastructure to help companies operate sucessfully
street crime, certain are labelled are not a serious, corporations commit the biggest crimes.
wont enforce laws against pollution,worker rights and monopolys
David gordon
-
-
by putting some working class in prison it stops the, from revolting
-