Dissertation intro
Reasons for why sport participation and SPA needs to be studied
Self determination theory literature
SPA literature within sports
Current motivation literature on sports
Supporting evidence
Limitations and strengths of current literature
Previous motivation literature in sports
The student athletic population is at a higher risk of facing mental health problems compared to the eneral population (Gouttebarge et al, 2019) these factors are related to both sporting factors and non sporting factors
Lack of PA is a problem within the college population (Kilpatrick, Heber & Bartholomew, 2005). Most current research looking at motivation and adherance to PA focuses on exercise behaviour rather than sport participation (Dishman & Buckworth, 1996)
Frederick & Ryan (1993) and Ryan & Frederick (1997) were one of the first to directly compare the motivation to participate in sport and exercise (according to Kilpatrick et al, 2005)
1993 study = surveyed large sample of active ppts who identified their primary PA as individual sport or exercise . Sports ppts rated enjoyment & competence as primary motivating factors & exercise ppts rated body related motives
1997 study= small sample of aerobics and martial arts class ppts, competence & enjoyment linked to martial arts & body related motives linked to aerobics
Therefore sport appears to be motivated by intrinsic factors and exercise by extrinsic. A negative of these studies is they used MPAM which is comprised of enjoyment, competence & body related motives- the measure is very narrow so doesn't cover other possible motivators.
click to edit
Kilpatrick et al (2005)- 233 students 18-47 year old. Used the EMI-2 (51 items, 14 subscales) === Study found ppts were more likely to report intrinsic motives (enjoyment and challenge) for sport, whereas exercise ppts focussed more on appearance and weight
Key motivational factors for sports
Exercise ppts = reported greater motivation to exercise for appearance, strength & endurance, stress management, weight management & all 3 health variables, with the largest effect size differences for illhealth avoidance, positive health and appearance
Sport ppts= affiliation, challenge and competition and social recognition as higher motivators, with affiliation and competition having the largest effect sizes
This study however doesn't specify what type of sports were being studied (whether they were individual or team)- the sample size appears to be on recreational participants but this wasn't specified
Although sport involvement can promote adolescent adjustment, there is debate over which types of sports fascilitate psychological wellbeing (Dimech & Seiler, 2011)
Some argue team sports has better psychological outcomes compared to individual sports (Eime et al, 2013). They proposed that involvement in team sports enhances psychological, physical and social adjustment whereas individual sports is better associated with physical functioning and not so much with psychological and social outcomes. Why is this?
This was also supported by Wang, Chow & Amemiya (2017)
Wang, Chow & Amemiya (2017)
Examined expectancy value theory. Looked at whether sport motivation trajectories predicted individual and team based sport participation & if sport partiicpation reduced the development of depression in adolescence
They found individual sports participation didn't result in depressive symptoms declining across adolescence in the same way that team sports do. This supports (Eime & colleagues (2013) suggesting team based sport provides unique psychosocial benefits that improve psychological functioning
Longitudinal study
Sheehan, Herring & Campbell (2018)
Used the framework of the Hierarchical Model of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation (HMIEM) which is an extension of SDT. HMIEM provides a framework or understanding of the determinants and consequences of motivation at a global (personality) contextual (life domain) and situational (state) levels (Vallerand, 1997)
SDT addresses the why of behaviour aswell as its ancedents and consequences (Deci & Ryan, 2000), and it is most influential in competitive sport motivation (Clancy et al, 2016)
This study focussed on motivation at the contextual level as contextual motivation includes an individuals motivation behaviour in a life domain (e.g. sport)
Looked at team sports (N= 215, 65% female and 35% male) playing at the highest national level within their sport
relatedness was associated with the most self determined controlled form of motivation (introjected regulation) which contradicts prior literature. An athlete is also more likely to feel obligated to do something (introjected regulation) when they feel connected to others (relatedness) such as in team sports. There was also a lack of an association between competence and motivation which contradicts prior literature
Egli et al (2011) studied the student population and found that males appear to be motivated for intrinsic reasons (competition and challenge) and females were more driven by extrinsic factors (body weight and appearance)
Sport seems to attract people for the following reasons: enjoyment, fun, improving skills, learning, being with friends, success, winning and health (Gaston-Gayles, 2005; Murcia et al, 2010)
Motivation is the driver for participation in sport, people participate for different reasons across diverse contexts and so it is important to understand these varying reasons as there is still a lot of debate (Kondric et al, 2013). The reasons for drop out are also diverse (Barnett et al, 2008; Biddle et al, 2003) so its important to understand to put preventative measures in place
Mishra & Acharya (2017) compared exercise and sport participation motives among uni students. They used the EMI-2 scale and found health & fitness motives were the biggest motivators in exercise behaviour compared to sport. Appearance/ weight motives were sig more important in exercise than sport, competition factors seemed to be more important in sport than exercise and enjoyment was rated the most important for both sport and exercise
PALMS scale- Zach, Bar-Eli, Morris & Moore, 2012) suggested that future research should use the PALMS in other activities and countries as it provides valuable info for health authorities and fitness professionals concerning the range of motives people have for sport participation
Dei & Ryan (2000) SDT was developed to distinguish between intrinisc, extrinsic and amotivation- it works by observing behaviour and identifying a level of SDT in relation to the "degree to which peoples actions are influenced by internal and external forces" (Lewis & Sutoon, 2011, p.86)
Kouncu, Tok, Canpolat & Catikkas (2010) examined the relationship between SPA, self esteem and body fat ration in female exercisers and non exercisers. Found female college student athletes were more satisfied with their physical appearance and had lower SPA and higher self esteem compared to the groups who didn't execise and the ones who were nationally recognized as elite athletes.
Robinson & Lewis (2016) studied the influence of sporting confidence and participation. Found those who scored higher on the SPAS tended to rank their confidence in sport as sig lower than those who scored low on it. SPA was also higher in females than males whoch is consistent with prior research
They suggested the GAP in the literature- that future studies should look at the underlying motivation behind sport participation which could help to explain the relationship between SPA and sport participation
Portman, Bradbury & Lewis (2018) found support that despite SPA being higher in females than males, it doesn't appear to deter individuals from taking part in physical activity, females just report using higher intensity training than men
Non supporting evidence for SPA leading to decreased participation
click to edit
Recent years has shown a decline in physical activity (Molanorouzi, khoo & Morris, 2015)
Molanorouzi, Khoo & Morris (2015) found that team sport ppts showed higher motives for affiliation and mastery compared to the rest of the sample, with lower motives for physical condition. Individual racing sport and bowls ppts were motivated most by enjoyment compared to the rest of the sample, but less motivated by appearance and affiliation. For raquet sports ppts mastery was the most important factor with competition also representing a meaningful contributor compared ot the rest of the sample. Exercisers showed higher motives for psychological condition, appearance and physical condition, but lower motives than the rest of the sample for mastery and competition/ego. Martial arts ppts= competition/ego contributed the most with mastery and psychological condition also representing meaningful contributors compared to the rest of the sample
They also found females to be more motivated by appearance motives which is consistent with previous literature, suggesting that my sample would also rate these highly along with SPA
This study wasn't supported by Chowdrey or Morris et al as they found competition/ego was higher in raquet sport ppts- the inconsistencies might be due to differing sporting levels as Molanorouzi's ppts were primarily developmental/recreational tennis players compared with chowdreys who were highly competitive
click to edit
Eklund & Crawford (1994) found college women high in SPA didn't like the look of videos of exercises with aerobic dance clothing on but showed a positive attitude when the same video ppts wore clothing de-emphasising the body. They also found women who exercised for weight control reasons reported higher SPA compared to those who exercised for other reasons (may explain my non-sig result of SPA because I wasn't studying exercise ppts- and sports ppts often don't focus as much on their body
They also found that gymnasts reported the most favourable self perceptions with lower SPA compared with soccor players and skaters- this is surprising, however the small sample size of the gymnasts (N=9) warrents extreme caution
Gay, Monsma & Torres-McGehee (2011) doesn't support these findings and found that SPA was reported as 4.5 times higher for individual aesthetic sport athletes than non aesthetic sport athletes
Several studies have demonstrated how exercise & sports participation can lower SPA, however fewer studies have looked at how it could heighten SPA (Zabinski, Calfas, Gehrman, Wilfley & Sallis, 2001)
Impacts sport
Doesn't impact it
click to edit
Hagger & Stevenson (2010) suggest that people with high SPA are likely to avoid situations where their physiues are central to the activity (gymnastics & swimming) o control how they are viewed by others
Atalay & Gencoz (2008) suggest SPA has an impact on motivation for sports, however Bushman & Bradeburg (2009) suggest that SPA leads to an avoidance of sport but due to exercise aiding in weight loss it may reduce SPA- this shows conflicting research in the literature
SDT has been linked to higher levels of PA participation (Edmunds et al, 2006; Wilson, Rodgers, Fraser & Murray, 2004), whilst these studies support the main idea of SDT the underlying factors that influence SD motivation for PA need to be further explored
There isn't a clear, well established definition of elite athletes, so results differ between the literature and can't be as easily compared. This is an issue as some non expert groups were also categorized at a higher level than the elite/expert groups in other studies
Swann, Moran & Piggott (2015) developed a model to help future studies define elite athlets
Martin, Engels, Wirth & Smith (1997)- looked at predictors of SPA, self esteem, body esteem, public body consciousness and % body fat in figure skaters, soccer players and gymnasts. They examined females because females are often critical of their physiques so SPA is a meaningful construct to investigate with girls (phelps et al, 1993)
The numerous health benefits associated with exercise make investigating the motivators and barriers an important topic for research, once these are clearly defined then intrventions can be put in place to minimise the barriers to PA and maximise the motivators (Hickey & Mason, 2017)
Benefits & current problems with PA
Regular PA plays an important role on both physical and psychologicalfactors such as weight management, fitness, wellbeing and enjoyment (Mandolesi, Polverino, Montuori et al, 2018), however the number of physically inactive adults has increased in recentyears (Dumith, Hallal, Reis & Kohl, 2011)- they did a meta analysis on 26 longitudinal studies and found that in 22 of them a decline in PA was found across ages 9-18 with the steepest decline between 15 and 18
Maltby & Day (2001) found intrinsically motivated undergrads had better psychological functioning compared to extrinsically motivated undergrads
Conflicting evidence for this was on a study examining college students key motives for exercise and found that the most popular student motive was extrinsic motivation, specifically to improve health status, illhealth avoidance, followed by appearance, strength and endurance and weight management (Egli, Bland, Melton & Czech, 2011)
Chowdhury (2012)- suggested that it is plausable to believe that there will be systematic differences between the levels of participation, even within the same kinds of physical activity- i.e. a competitive tennis layer will pursue PA seriously whereas a recreational tennis player might play tennis at a local club with friends. Rowchowdrey suggested a GAP that motives for participation differ from person to person so comparing participants motives for engaging in PA and the level they are involved in would be beneficial.
Morris et al (1995) found individual sports placed more emphasis on enjoyment and mastery- it has also been noted that individual sports participants engage for more instrinsic reasons (Frederick & Ryan, 1993)
Markland & Ingledew (2007) suggested that different motives carry different significance depending on whether the are intrinsic or extrinsic. Intrinsic motives i.e. enjoyment and challenge are autonomous in nature so will be likely to maintained in the long term, whereas extrinsic motives that are controlling in nature such as appearance aren't likely to be maintained in the long term
• Social level participants rated appearance, others expectations and affiliation as the primary motivators , whereas club level participants scored the highest on the subscale of competition/ ego compared with recreational and social ppts
click to edit
Is it maybe the categorisation of club ppts that fasciliate this? Also this supports my findings
They define 'club' as people who are members of an organisation/ centre such as a fitness centre. My ppts were part of a society and a 'club' but were labelled as recreational. They recreational ppts would have had dedicated training sessions every week and may have done small competitions at the end or competed against other unis in friendlies at a similar level, so this may have been a goal they strived towards therefore choosing competiiton as higher
The study by Sukys et al (2019) found appearance/ weight to be the least important motive for leisure time PA, with health being the top motive. Previous studies revealed gender differences in relation to PA motives (Molanorouzi et al, 2015; Patay et al., 2015; Rubio Henao & Varela Arevalo, 2016), with weight and appearance being more important factors for women
As to weight and appearance motives, students tend to gain weight during college (Pope, Hansen, & Harvey, 2017), and women have tended to be more overweight than men (Molanorouzi et al., 2015). The demands for initiating new relationships may make young adults particularly concerned about their physical appearance (J. Fletcher, 2016), and female students tend to be particularly concerned about and less satisfied with their bodies than are male students (Mintem, Gigante, & Horta, 2015).
The greatest decreases in physical activity occur during high school and college (Youth Risk Behaviour Surveillance Survey, 2013), and those declines persisting after graduation (Kilpatrick, Heber & Bartholomew, 2005)
Targeting college students is important as they experience many lifestyle changes that impact physical activity with physiological changes occurring which may increase students concerns about body image (Rosin, Trachtenberg & Cohen, 2001)
Declines in PA begin during college and continue until age 29 (National Centre for Health Statistics, 2012)
Ousley, Cordero & White (2007) found college students are usually more extrinsically motivated, especially if they hear conversations or engage in conversations about other peoples physical appearance
Milroy et al (2015) found females to be especially susceptable to extrinsic motivation as they are more likely to be active for appearance and weight control reasons
Walczak & Tomczak (2019)used the polish version of the SMS and found individual athletes who performed at a high level experienced lower levels of intrinsic motivation compared with recreational athletes
click to edit
click to edit