Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
(science, not a science), Karl Popper, Steven seidman, Durkheim, Thomas…
-
Karl Popper
-
-
Sociological fame Karl Popper is a world renown sociologists and philosopher , as such his fame and his impacts are significant.
-
Sociological contribution argued sociology could be scientific if it was deductive, if sociological study was not scientific then it was not a science
persuasiveness due to his significant fame in sociology, aswell as the all swans are white analogy makes his ideas significant
use in study not all sociology is a science, but it can be if its deductive
Steven seidman
-
-
Sociological fame sociologist and lecturer, works on sociological theory
Top concepts postmodernist, reject science
sociological contribution believes sociology should not aspire to be a science, as science is a metatheory
Persuasiveness not very persuasive, looks like a cult leader
-
Durkheim
-
Fame- 10, father of posivtist sociologists
-
sociological contribution believes that sociologists can look at paterns and used scientific methods, making it a science.,
persuasiveness 10 , very persuavive as he proves it with his study on suicide
Thomas Kuhn
-
Sociological contribution science is a pradaigm, sociology is not as there is not dominating theory
-
-
Sayer
-
Fame, 5 significant contributins to methodology
-
-
because of this we can conclude that sociology is not a science due to the significant amount of sociologists on the right hand side of the graph. however the sociologists on the left hand side of the graph are more convincing making there to be a argument for sociology to be a science one
Criticisms of Durkheim
his research was not objective, he chose he researcher because a close friend committed suicide,
Not all data was objectively gathered, coroner reports not objective
Criticisms of Kuhn
lakatos argued Kuhn idea of a paradigm was to simplistic and only applied to the past
Critisism Of popper
Many scientific discoveries have come about without the scientific
science isnt always conducted in the smaw way