Complex Analysis of Askaryan Radiation: A Fully Analytic Model in the Time-Domain

Abstract flow-down

UHE-nu detections

Askaryan-class detectors

Prior work: fully analytic model, 3D form factor, LPM elongation (all omega, all theta)

On-cone analytic model in the time-domain

Extend to all time, all theta

Explain features: tied to physical parameter space

Comparison to NuRadioMC and semi-analytic results

Introduction

Astroparticle physics and the Askaryan Effect

RICE, ANITA, ARIANNA, ARA, IceCube-Gen2

LOFAR, AERA

Lines of Work

MC: ZHS and others

Fully analytic: RB

Semi-analytic: ARVZ, ARZ, etc.

NuRadioMC

Section outline

Units, definitions, and conventions

Derivation of the form factor

Opening diagram geometry: viewing angle, cascade length and width

Definition of the 3D Fourier transform, and form factor

Discussion of cascade maximum, cascade width and how it relates to energy

Units of normalizing factors

Apply the definition

Quote the current and the function f(x,t)

Cite the prior paper to justify definition

Provide example (appendix?) of ZHS form factor and GEANT4

Compare to analogue filter theory, define omega_CF and omega_0, f_CF and f_0

Include here the derivations of "a ~ ln(E/E_crit)"

On-cone field equations

Derivation from form factor and RB equations (draw from last paper but correct errors)

Definition of eta, definition and justification of omega_C, f_C

Graph: basic E-field with varying epsilon (normalized) Illustrate the asymmetry potential, and compare and contrast to -dA/dt of ARVZ

Discuss observables

Asymmetry (epsilon)

Pulse width (cutoff-frequencies)

Amplitude

Off-cone field equations

Derivation from form factor and RB equations

"All theta, all omega" vs. "all theta, all t"

Graph: basic E-field with varying cutoff frequencies and viewing angles (normalized) Illustrate the role of p (pulse width), and theta-dependence with several cutoff frequencies

Omega_C

R E (energy)

a (Energy)

rho_0 (quantum mechanics)

Discuss observables

Pulse width: delta-theta and a

First scan theta, a (x-axis correlation)

Obtain constant pulse-width

Next, scan w_0 and E

Discuss error estimation

Discuss 3-variable scan

Comparison to semi-analytic parameterizations

Describe procedure

Digitization

Resampling and smoothing

Graphs and Tables

On-cone

Off-cone

Graph: display fits, Table of fit parameters

Graph: display fits, Table of fit parameters

Graphs: cascade-a vs. theta off-cone

Describe fit procedure: correlation with cascade-a and theta (x-axis), then sum-squares with E and omega_0

quote results in table, waveform parameters, and correlation and power %, include cascade-a from Gaussian fits

Graphs: f_0 vs. f_C

Describe fit procedure: since we know theta = theta_C, just a 3-level loop over omega_C, omega_0, and E

Just minimizing sum-squares

quote results in table, waveform parameters, and correlation and power %, include cascade-a from Gaussian fits

Conclusion

Three ways this can be used

Restrict to case in which theta is already known

Graph of a (waveform) vs. a (fit from Gaussian)

First, when analytic models are
matched to observed data, cascade properties may be calculated directly from single RF waveforms.

Second, fully analytic models require no Monte Carlo simulation of cascade particle trajectories,
minimizing computational intensity.

(Some assessment of speed or O(N) computational complexity?)

Third, fully analytic models can be embedded in firmware to
enhance the real-time sensitivity of detectors.

Diagram of the idea

Thermal noise rejection power (maybe scan and correlate to Gaussian white noise)

Summary

Thank those involved

Quote major results in a Table

Subsection about uncertainty principle