Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

PEER REVIEW FEEDBACK, I once again talked about semiotics too much and…

- - - - I was able to tie this into the topic sentence and expand from there
  - - - I think this is easily doable, and I can expand on analyzing ideas
  - - - I was able to take this part out completely and draw my focus towards how it works within the community
  - - - once again, relate this back to genre and how emojis are a function
- - - - peer review feedback suggested I include a direct source to guide readers
        
        I agreed with this and added a source to contextualize emojis in relation to semiotics
        
        in doing so, I discussed too much about semiotics and didn't end up relating this point back to genre
        
        Was suggested that stating simply that the star emoji takes on a new rhetorical inference could be enough. related back to how it impacts users.
        
        I wasn't connection how people act differently on TikTok as a result of the emojis.
        
        Could simply discuss genre as a social action and how it allows people to act within the community without knowing the origins of the meaning making process.
        
        1 more item...
  - - - "discuss more if this form of communication is beneficial or not. Does it create a stronger community. Why is it so important to communicate like that on TikTok but not elsewhere?"
        
        I was able add a paragraph elaborating on this more
- - - - with this comment I was able to see how I can make room to implement they say / I say structures (directly or indirectly)