Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
ESA Week9 - Coggle Diagram
ESA Week9
-
points to note
when you are doing multi objective, need to ensure you are doing all of the same thing (all max, all min). so if you have min cost, max performance, you need to multiply cost by -1. so the largest negative value is the worst.smallest and the smallest negative value is the best/largest
visualisation tips
try to avoid objectives that aggregate data such that it hides weights and conceals the effects of specific weights. for eg: aggregating cost together (operating cost, capital expenditure, misc cost into one thing as cost will conceal the effects of each)
-
symbols, colour, or size
note that colour and size can be used for continuous but symbol cannot. use symbols only for discrete
if you want, you can convert 1 and 0 to as.character(...) so that it appears as "1" and "0" with only 2 separate colours in the graph
coding tips
paretosorting_adv(input, "MAX"/"MIN")
the input must be a matrix
the paretosorting_adv function can process 2,3, or more objectives. when you have 2 objectives, you might have 16 dominated solutions, but when you have 3 , you might only have 4 dominated solutions
parallel coordinates, ideal solution is a line at the top of the plot for maximisation functions
-
-
-
-
-
-
pareto efficient means this solutions is not worse off in all objectives, and strictly better in one objective
when you normalise for a maximisation problem, the bottom and the top negative signs will cancel out. Also, in R you dont have to care about nadir or utopia, by subtracting min from max you by definition normalise it alr
-