Democratic and Non-democratic Regimes

Democratic regimes

Hybrid regimes: political systems that have some of the appearances of being democratic, but institutions, processes, laws, and policies are manipulated to keep rulers or elite groups in power

Non-democratic regimes

Representative democracy: A system of government in which members of a community elect people to represent their interests and to make decisions affecting the community

Direct/deliberate democracy: A system of government in which all members of the community take part in making the decisions that affect that community

authoritarian regimes: regimes based on submission to authority, characterized by ruling elites, limited political pluralism, centralized political control, intolerance of opposition, and human rights abuses

totalitarian regimes: the most absolute form of authoritarian rule, based either on a guiding ideology or the goal of major social change, with total control exercised by a leader, state, or party over all aspects of public and private life

E-democracy: a form of democratic expression through which all those with an interest in a problem or an issue can express themselves via the internet or social media, thereby participating in the shaping of government decision

Liberal (full) democracy: A form of indirect democracy in which the scope of democracy is limited by constitutional protection of individual rights

Electoral (flawed) democracy: enjoys most features full democracies do, but experiences weaknesses such as problems in governance, underdeveloped political culture, low levels of political participation

Robert Dahl

checks and balances: an arrangement in which government institutions are given powers that counter-balance one another, obliging them to work together in order to govern and make decisions

civil liberties: The rights that citizens have relative to government, and that should not be restricted by the government

liberalism: a belief in the supreme value of the individual, who is seen to have natural rights that exist independently of government, and who must therefore be protected from too much government

limited government: a belief that guarantees must be made for citizens by placing limits on the powers and reach of government

Two dimensions of democracy

Contestation: the extent to which citizens enjoy unimpaired opportunities to express their political preferences (such as voting or demonstrating)

Inclusiveness: the share of the population that is entitled to participate in the political system

introduced because

There has to be a serious degree of inclusion of the population into the political process

No real country will ever perfectly attain contestation and inclusion, according to Dahlt, real democracy doesn't exist

You need more than just elections to make democracy meaningful, meaning extensive rights such as demonstrating

structural violence: a term used to describe the social and economic oppression built into a system of government

Modernization and Democracy

Huntington's waves of democracy

Modernization: the process of acquiring the attributes of a modern society, or one reflecting contemporary ideas, institutions and norms

liberal democracy as the modern way?

Modern: a term used to characterize a state with an industrial or post-industrial economy, affluence, specialized occupations, social mobility, and an urban and educated population

Economic security raises the quality of governance by reducing incentives for corruption

High-income countries have more interest groups to reinforce liberal democracy

Wealth softens class differences, producing a more equal distribution of income and turning the working class away from 'leftist extremism', while the presence of a large middle class tempers class conflict between rich and poor

Education and urbanization also make a difference. Education inculcates democratic and tolerant values, while towns have always been the wellspring of democracy

Waves of democratization: a group of transitions from non-democratic to democratic political systems that occurs within a specified period of time and that significantly outnumbers transitions in the opposite direction during that period

First wave: 1828 - 1926

Second wave: 1943 - 1962

Third wave: 1974 - 1991

Democratization

The future of democracy

Britain/France/US

very long wave, gradual extension of the principles of democracy into political systems (universal suffrage)

India/Israel/Japan/West Germany

associated with post-war rebuilding and decolonization

Southern and Eastern Europe/Latin America/parts of Africa

characterized by how global it is and how many countries were involved. symbolized by Berlin Wall

Political regime: although, strictly speaking, this has the same meaning as the term political system, it is typically used pejoratively to refer to authoritarian political systems

Transition: arrangements are made for the new system of government

Consolidation: widespread acceptance of the new system, supported by evidence that it works

Liberalization: initiation of the reform sequence, usually as a result of recognition by authoritarian rulers that change is inevitable

Deepening: democracy evolves from the superficial to the substantial

End of history: the idea that a political, economic, or social system has developed to such an extent that it represents the culmination of the evolutionary process

Populism: a political programme or movement based on championing the rights and interests of the people in the face of the ruling elite

challenges

gender unequality

racism and religious discrimination

economic inequality

sultanistic (neo-patrimonial regimes)

features

Juan Linz (differences with authoritarian)

type of mobilization: a lot of forced mobilization of people into participation

type of leadership: undefined and high limits of unpredictability, leadership comes from large political organization that delivers them to top position

degree of pluralism: totalitarian regime is anything but plural, trying to eliminate independent activity within a society

features

mechanisms of rule

examples

additional points

elections but no alteration in power

limited restraint in exercise of power

administrative manipulations: testing opposition through regulatory control

politicization of the state and institutions: form a favorable bureaucracy

patronage and clientelism: material incentive for votes

Turkey

Kenya

Hungary

Almost never stable, either becomes democratic or authoritarian

Hybrid regimes may be dangerous, more likely to go to war

Prevalent during and after 3rd wave of democracy

Hybrid classification makes other countries more lenient, enables dangerous behaviour

constrained opposition

media censorship

few limits on the powers of government

limited forms of political participation

weak political institutions and processes

poor representation in government

transition democracy problems

forms

devices

corruption: the abuse of office for private gain

ruling parties

military government

personal rule: a form of rule in which authority is based less on the office held than on personal and often corrupt links between rulers and their patrons, associates, clients, and supporters

theocracy: govenment by religous leaders

absolute monarchy: a form of government in which a monarch wields absolute power over a state, and in which all other institutions of government are marginal. should not be confused with the limited powers of a constitutional monarchy.

patronage: support, encouragement, access, and privileges bestowed by one individual or organization on another. in the case of authoritarian regimes, the term describes the use of state resources by leaders to reward those providing support to the regime

media

coercion: the use of threats, sanctions, or force against groups or individuals as a means of compelling them either to undertake or desist from a particular course of action

despotism: the exercise of absolute power, often characterized by the abuse of the powers of office, arbitrary choices, and the use of violent intimidation. the term is interchangeable with dictatorship, tyranny and autocracy

military

features: a ruling sovereign enters control, with other members of the royal family in key political and military posts

examples: Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, UAE

features: the presidency dominates government and the media, with opponents kept off-guard and the opposition marginalized

examples: several former soviet-union republics and sub-saharan African states

features: rule by a single party, often combined with a strong president

examples: many African states and remaining communist states

features: government by the military, often ruling through a junta comprising of the leaders of each branch of the armed forces

examples: many African, Asian, and Latin American countries in the decade following WWII. less common today

features: a rare form of rule in which religious leaders govern directly

examples: Iran

cult of personality: an arrangement in which authoritarian leaders use the media, propaganda, and political institutions to make sure that they dominate how the wider population relates to a political system

Coup d'État: an illegal seizure of political power by the military

Islamic Republic: a state based on an Islamic constitution and full application of Islamic law (sharia), although the precise role of the latter is sometimes ambiguous

patronage

nepotism/cryonism

influence peddling

embezzlement

bribing

kickbacks

electoral fraud

absence of functioning vibrant civil society (no social capital)

nature of leadership gives a lot of power to certain institutions, problem when containing the military for example

features

transition democracy problems

no extensive mobilization, sometimes crazy projects to entice support

some pluralism but subject to depsotic intervention

highly personalistic leadership, intensely feared and unpredictable, dynastic or clan-based

there is no state structure/bureaucracy to organize the country