Sources

Canan, S. N., Jozkowski, K. N., & Crawford, B. L. (2018). Sexual Assault Supportive Attitudes: Rape Myth Acceptance and Token Resistance in Greek and Non-Greek College Students From Two University Samples in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(22), 3502–3530. https://doi-org.proxy.mul.missouri.edu/10.1177/0886260516636064

Eisenberg, M. E., Lust, K. A., Hannan, P. J., & Porta, C. (2016). Campus sexual violence resources and emotional health of college women who have experienced sexual assault. Violence and Victims, 31(2), 274-284. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-14-00049

Harris, J. C., Linder, C., & Wanjuki, W. (2017). Centering Women of Color in the Discourse of Sexual Violence. In Intersections of identity and sexual violence on campus: Centering minoritized students' experiences (pp. 42-56). Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Klein, L. B., Brewer, N. Q., Mennicke, A., Christensen, M. C., Baldwin-White, A., Cloy, C., & Wood, L. (2020). Centering minoritized students in campus interpersonal violence research. Journal of Family Violence, doi:10.1007/s10896-020-00223-8

Palmer, J. E., Fissel, E. R., Hoxmeier, J., & Williams, E. (2021). #MeToo for whom? sexual assault disclosures before and after #MeToo. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 46(1), 68-106. doi:10.1007/s12103-020-09588-4

Powell, A. (2010). Chapter 7: Education. In Sex, power and consent: Youth culture and the unwritten rules (pp. 126-153). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tillapaugh, D. (2017). Chapter 5: "The Wounds of Our Experience" College Men Who Experienced Sexual Violence. In Intersections of identity and sexual violence on campus: Centering minoritized students' experience. Dulles: Stylus Publishing.

Tilley, D. S., Kolodetsky, A., Cottrell, D., & Tilton, A. (2020). Correlates to increased risk of sexual assault and sexual harassment among LGBT+ university students. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 16(2), 63-72. doi:10.1097/JFN.0000000000000284

Wade, L. (2016, August 23). Sex on campus isn't what you think: What 101 STUDENT JOURNALS taught me. Retrieved February 25, 2021, from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/aug/23/sex-on-campus-hookup-culture-student-journals

Worthen, M. G. F., & Wallace, S. A. (2017). Intersectionality and Perceptions About Sexual Assault Education and Reporting on College Campuses. Family Relations, 66(1), 180–196. https://doi-org.proxy.mul.missouri.edu/10.1111/fare.12240

this article is going to help me explain the sexual violence disparity among LGBTQ+ college students and their risk of sexual violence. I think it is important to go over this, because a lot of the time LGBTQ+ individuals are left out of the conversation, and research, which leads people to believe that survivors of sexual violence are only thin, young, straight white women. In reality, LGBTQ+ students are put at a higher risk of experiencing sexual violence. This article finds that LGBTQ+ students are more likely to have a friend group that approves of risky sexual behavior compared to cis heterosexual students. This attitude adds into the culture of violence on campuses.

A huge part of rape and hookup culture on college campuses comes from Greek life. Specifically, fraternities tend to carry rape-supportive attitudes and endorse behaviors that contribute to the toxic culture. This gives good explanations of rape myths and acts of token resistance (pushing a sexual act that has been rejected, with the intent of still engaging in that act). It also goes into the sense of aggression within frats and how that support drives victim blaming.

Sexual violence prevention programs on campuses often fail to address the underlying systems of oppression that fuel rape culture. They instead tend to focus on the basic, stereotypical scenes of violence (a young white woman taken and raped by a stranger in a dark alley). This is harmful, as students with intersections of multiple minority identities tend to be at the highest risk of experiencing sexual violence.

this is an interesting article on hookup culture on college campuses. it goes through some anecdotes to explain the lived culture shock of moving to such an openly sexual environment. I like how this also explains that hookup culture has little to do with the physical action of having sex, but the created atmosphere resulting from the gendered assumption that everyone in college wants to and is participating in casual sex. While sex is great and hookups can be safe and enjoyable, the overall culture promotes sexual violence.

this is another chapter over hookup and rape culture on campuses. A lot of this sexual pressure is rooted in gender norms. This chapter also explores the effects of a cis heterosexual, abstinence based sex education and how that education seeps into collective attitudes on sex in general and sexual violence. Sexual assault can be much SO more than non-consensual penis-in-vagina, and many people are unfortunately never taught that. Campus prevention education cannot be fully effective until schools create more inclusive sex ed and programs to understand all forms of violence.

1/5 men are still survivors of sexual violence beyond rape, although we often don't consider men as victims in our conversations about rape. This is largely because of the patriarchal and masculinity standards that are placed on men and boys from the moment they are born. Many social factors create barriers in men feeling like they are not able to disclose their experiences of sexual violence. College campuses need to realize that there is still violence happening to men at alarming rates, even if very few are coming outright and saying it. This also goes into intersectional identities of men and how their experiences are put at even greater risk.

Students tend to perceive sexual violence based on their own lived experiences with it. This article explores different identities and how aspects of privilege and oppression shapes attitudes on sexual violence. Oppressed identities, like LGBTQ+ are angry that programs in place to educate on sexual violence are mostly heteronormative, when in reality, they are the more likely demographic to experience sexual violence. We should cater our prevention and support programs toward the identities that are experiencing the highest rates of IPV to help as many students as possible, and not make the programs look exclusive to stereotyped identities. Also, privileged groups, like white people and men (especially Greek men) are not very supportive of these educational programs, so we need to make priority to educate these groups that tend to cause the harm and dismantle the culture that they are so stuck in.

the #MeToo movement was overall a great start to the ongoing fight to stop sexual violence, but it might have been harmful in some ways as well. Following the movement, there was an increase in disclosure of sexual violence experiences among all undergraduate students! Also, there was increased disclosures among Black students, but a decline in multiracial students. Students who felt #MeToo impacted their perception of sexual assault were more likely to disclose past sexual violence.

this source goes over the disproportionate rate of sexual violence on Black women vs White women. It talks about the unique identity of black women and how they are left on the back burner since they experience such a different form of racism and sexism simultaneously, which puts them at higher risk. It also touches on history of African diaspora and how ignoring that alone causes more racism and harm to continue on. There are many stereotypes placed on Black women that serve as barriers in disclosure and access to support when experiencing sexual violence.

this sums up the importance of having effective sexual violence resources on college campuses. Participants who attended colleges with more resources ended up with less mental health issues compared to participants who go to schools with fewer resources. These programs decrease chances of trauma symptoms, like anxiety, depression, PTSD. More inclusive sexual violence resources should extend this support to all victims, and create better outcomes for survivors.