Algorithmic Societies

Ethics in CSS

Cybersecurity & Privacy

Justice in Algorithmic Societies
applies to different domains of human (inter-)action calling for different forms of what is right (justice)

Philosophy

Benefits of Philosophy

Creative Reflection

Critical Reflection

Method of Philosophy

Develop arguments

  • List of Propositions
  • Inferences between propositions
  • Conclusion


P1: all men are mortal
P2. Socrates is a man
C: Socrates is mortal

Theoretical Reasoning

Practical Reasoning

Demand for

  • non-contradiction
  • sensitivity to evidence
  • Enkratic requirement
  • Means-End coherence

Logic

Modus Ponens
If A is true, then B is true.
A is true. Therefore, B is true.

Modus Tollens
If A is true then B is true.
B is not true. Therefore, A is not true.

NO Codes of Conduct

Preliminaries
Ethics...

  • is no spoil-sport
  • helps exploring early on the values that are often implicit
  • can help a responsible innovation process
  • helps us find making explicit which kind of future we want

Ethics in AI

Ethics of Data Science

Ethics for Algorithms

Research Ethics
for any conscious subject

Broad Fields

Differentiating AI

  • weak AI
  • machine learning
  • deep learning
  • general AI
  • consciousness
  • ...
    is true AI even achievable? / How to know when we achieved it?

Can moral decision-making be automated?

Impact of progressive automation on work
Changing working conditions; the kinds of work humans will do...

"Evil Geniuses"

Robot / Machine Rights

Singularity and existential threats
Humanity and sensitivity to human values

Asimov’s Laws of Robotics

  • A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
  • A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
  • A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.

UK’s Principles of Robotics

  • Robots should not be designed as weapons, except for national security reasons.
  • Robots should be designed and operated to comply with existing law, including privacy.
  • Robots are products: as with other products, they should be designed to be safe and secure.
  • Robots are manufactured artefacts: the illusion of emotions and intent should not be used to exploit vulnerable users.
  • It should be possible to find out who is responsible for any robot.

Timeline Questions
when to ask which AI-question?

Human-Centered AI
Designing an AI system that gives human excitement, more enjoyment, more interest and empowers them to do the things they want to do.
AI in service to humans rather humans being in service of AI is the key difference
John Shawe-Taylor

Challenges

  • discrimination
  • reinforcement of biases
  • lack of transparency

FACT

  • fairness
  • Accuracy
  • confidentiality
  • Transparency

Additional ethical factors

  • trust
  • access
  • safety
  • sustainability
  • autonomy and agency
  • privacy
  • meaning

Code of Conduct

  • Lawfulness
  • Competence
  • Dealing with Data
  • Algorithms and models
  • Transparency, Objectivity and Truth
  • Working alone and with others (responsibility in teams)
  • (extra) Upcoming ethical challenges

Oxford Munich Code

activity documentation

data adequacy evaluation

artificial data handling
responsibility to communicate all procedures to make the original data more adequate for a specific problem

responsible data selection
analysis of input data in order to assess it for any indicators of previous bias like cherry-picking/model back to particular statement/insight/outcome

inherent data bias
analyze & document potential bias

Accuracy vs Explainability trade off
the more accurate the data is, the harder it is to be broken into pieces and to be explained

Transparency as a duty
transparency in a forum as allowable by legal and proprietary constraints

Team code acquaintance and deviating behaviors

  • make sure all colleagues follow the code
  • flag deviating behavior

responsibility on inventions

  • gauging benefit vs risk of any invention
  • protection & security of potential harming inventions

Rules

Strengthen Competency

Define Responsibilities

Document Goals and Anticipated Impact

Guarantee Security

Provide Labeling

Ensure Intelligibility

Safeguard Manageability

Monitor Impact

Establish complaint mechanisms

Traditional View
Role responsibility of scientists
(understanding world) overrules general
responsibility as humans

Consequences of Knowledge

Dual Use Problem
The designer's purpose does not exhaust the use of a product


Dual-Use == the unintended use of a product


"Are designers ethically responsible not only for what we intend a product to do, but also for the dual-use thereof?"

Standard of Reasonable conscientiousness
what can be expected from a reasonable person

Great Complexity
greater difficulty to foresee

Generalizability of the Tool
the more generalizable the more difficult to foresee single use

Codes of Conduct

IEEE Code if Ethics

II
To treat all persons fairly and with respect, to not engage in harassment or discrimination, and to avoid injuring others.

III
To strive to ensure this code is upheld by colleagues and co-workers.

I
To uphold the highest standards of integrity, responsible behavior, and ethical conduct in professional activities.

2.
improve the understanding by individuals and society of the capabilities and societal implications of conventional and emerging technologies, including intelligent systems;

3.

  • avoid real or perceived conflicts of interest whenever possible
  • disclose conflicts of itnerest if they exist

4.

  • avoid unlawful conduct
  • reject bribery

5.
seek, accept, offer honest criticism
to

  • acknowledge & correct errors
  • be honest & realistic
    credit properly to contribution of others

6.

  • stick to qualified tasks
  • disclose about pertinent limitations

1.

  • hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public
  • comply with ethical design & sustainable development practices
  • protect privacy of others
  • disclose factors that might endanger the public/environment

ACM
association for computing machinery

Reflection upon wider impact of work supporting the public good

Ethical decisions occur during the planning for and conducting of research, not just when applying results to new technology

BIG Questions

How to ensure non-maleficience

What is the greater good?

What increases well-being?

  • individually
  • socially
  • globally

Explanation of Inequality in
an online environment

Homophily & Heterophily

Lazardsfeld & Mertoin 1954

role in social networks

h=0
complete heterophily

minorities in beneficial position

tendency of unsimilar nodes to attach to each other

= bond in diverse groups

leads to

weak ties in a group

weak ties are more
effective in reaching individuals

higher influence by the differing (partner)

problems in communication

ties are harder to create & harder to maintain

a large number of nodes having a small number of links and a few of them having many

h = 1
complete homophily :

minorities in
underrepresented/disadvantaged
position

tendency of similar nodes to attach to each other

= bond in similar groups

types

status h.

race

gender

age

...

socio-economic status

value h.

attitudes that are valued

leads to

intrinsic level of interpersonal attraction

strong ties in the group

same information

less innovation though diffusion of information

a large number of nodes with a large number of links

degree of a node

number of edges that are incident to the vertex/node of a graph

convergence

weak integration

established nodes rather have
a new connection than new nodes

long-run integration

long term neighbouring nodes
delete bias between each other

partial integration

some bias stays while neighbouring nodes converge monotonically

preferential Attachment

Yule 1925/Price 1976

tendency of nodes preferentially attach to nodes of high degree

Privacy

Privacy Violation

accounts

access account
(Macnish)

violation when somebody else accesses one's data

Ex.:
if we lose diary and recollect it before somebody reads it, no privacy loss seems to occur

control account

Privacy is violated when somebody
takes control of ones data

even when no data is accessed

Vague naming vs specific naming
→ definition of privacy changes discussion on topic

cases

unaccessed data

No Blackmailing Attempt

no reduction in security

no privacy loss

Blackmailing Attempt

No privacy loss

reduction in security

accessed data

Blackmailing Attempt

privacy loss

reduction in security

No Blackmailing Attempt

privacy loss

no reduction in security

Dimensions

Decisional Privacy

Protects

people

decisions

actions

ways of life

Is Threatened By

State interference (laws, regulations, nudging, ...)

Interference by other people

Cultural expectations

Informational Privacy

Protects

Everything that can be known about people

Is Threatened By

Social Media

The Internet

Government Surveilance

Gossiping

Spying

Local Privacy

Protects

Whatever a Person does within her own four walls

Is Threatened By

Government intrusion (search warrants, SWAT teams)

Voyeurism

Lacking a room of one's own

Value of Privacy

Fosters personal autonomy &
development of one's personality

Creates autonomous democratic citizens

Protects human dignity

Allowed Privacy-Violation
leads to intimacy and personal relationship
(love, friendship, cooperation etc.)

Guarantees freedom from embarassment

Government Surveilance

video surveilance

telecommunication data

general safety measures

off-switch Problem

Arguments Against

  • external control over data without access leads to a conflict between internal & external power
  • does automatic processing data fall under the access of data?

Ideals of Justice

Distributive Justice
distribution by a fair share of resources

Relational Justice
justice stems from the relation between individuals
→ individual interactions AND institutional level

Types of Justice

organisation of society
political institutions

  • penal law
  • marriage laws
  • ...

distribution & exchange
of

  • goods
  • rights
  • entitlements

interaction between individuals

personal conduct, justice as virtue

Justices

  • distributive
  • relational
  • prodedural
  • interactional
  • retributive
  • transactional
  • restorative/transitional
  • epistemic
  • social
  • intergenerational
  • global
  • climate
  • gender
  • environmental
    ...
  • Algorithmic justice
    //any context in which different viewpoints can come into conflict

Dimensions of Justice

grounds of justice
what is the basis of justice claims?

  • eternal natural law
  • divine command
  • human equality
  • common ownership of Earth
  • imagined (global) social contract

site of justice
to which entities/agents do justice claims primarily apply?

  • governments
  • institutions
  • companies
  • groups
  • individuals

Scope of justice
among whom do obligations of justice pertain?

  • interactional
  • local
  • domestic
  • international
  • global

metrics of justice
how can justice be measured

  • goods
  • resources
  • wellbeing
  • opportunities/access
  • relational goods
  • recognition

patterns of justice
how is justice to be distributed?

  • equality
  • sufficiency
  • priority

principles of justice
according to which criteria do we decide about (re-)distribution

  • desert/effort (individual responsibility
  • maximal benefit
  • need (sufficiency/priority)
  • contract
  • equality
  • sustainability
  • authoritarian
  • ...

"The Good"
the positive demands - to be secured

  • everyone receives his/her due
  • "to each according to his need, from each according to his ability" (Marx)


+
all receive their due


-
flawed reality

"The Bad"
the negative demand - to be avoided

  • reduce unchosen disadvantage/hardship
  • avoid rewarding the irresponsible


+/-
unjust hardship/advantage
clustering of advantages/disadvantages
enhancing general injustices


//access to school for everyone gives access but says nothing about the quality of school in lower socioeconomic areas

"The Good"
the positive demands - to be secured

  • secure interactions among all 'on a footing of equality'
    • inter-individual
    • institutional
  • secure that all have enough to interact as equals


utopian reality: ability to connect and interact as equals across the world

"The Bad"
the negative demand - to be avoided

  • reduce/end oppression in its different forms
    • exploitation
    • marginalization
    • powerlessness
    • cultural imperialism
    • violence

Stuctural Injustice
when social processes

  • put large categories of persons under a systemic threat of domination or deprivation
  • enable others to dominate/have wide range of opportunities for developing and exercising their capabilities

(In)justice in the Digital Age

Oppression

Marginalization

  • discimination
  • acces denied
  • silent voices
  • silenced additionally through algorithmic bias and epistemic injustice

Powerlessness

  • unheard voices
  • inability to speak up / regulate the powerful agents

Cultural imperialism

  • cultural dominance from the Global North

Violence

  • cyber-hate
  • bullying

Types of Concern

"Classic" Concerns

  • surveillance & privacy
  • persuasive design practices
  • spread of misinformation online
  • lack of accountability
  • abuse

"Specific" Concern
distinctive intersection between social injustice & technology

  • digital sphere mirrors/perpetuates/increases the existing relational injustices IRL
  • implicit bias/algorithmic bias; epistemic injustice

Problem

Solution
== Structural Change

Motivation

  • making profits VS provision o essential services/catering to basic human needs (interaction, information, ...)


problem with distribution

One-Sidedness
not actively listening to people negatively affected (Silicon Valley techno-utopianism VS. experiences of diverse people underrepresented in Silicon Valley → abusive speech against Black Women)


→ problem of relation
(fairness/distribution alone does not capture it)

accountability, legal oversight, top-down regulation
→ digital sphere == public sphere where basic goods are distributed

Digital rights activism

  • in digital times
  • to digital services

-social equity

  • egalitarian ethos
  • responsibility
    in
  • individuals
  • companies
  • institutions

Exploitation

  • data-exploitation
  • power asymmetry
  • "free" services are paid with data

Responsibility for Justice

Top-Down VS Bottom-Up VS mixed views

international community

  • regulation: human right to internet access
  • initiative: (EU regulation, digital strategies, ...)

Governments
national legislation & initiatives

Companies
critique and debate within companies

Designers

  • design ethics
  • ethical trainings for engineers

Users
disruptive hacking

Citizens
broad public & political debate

individuals

  • ethical use
  • netiquette

Stereotypes in CSS

Prejudice
a hostile or negative attitude toward people in a distinguishable group based solely on their membership in that group

  • cognitive
    • beliefs
    • thoughts
  • affective
    • attitude of emotion
    • intensity of emotion
  • behavioral

Components

cognitive
categories as soon as we are born

  • gender
  • race
  • study program
  • only child
  • ...

Useful & necessary

  • danger: step towards prejudice

affective
deep-seated feelings
-> emotional heat towards a certain group

  • undermines logical thinking

behavioral

Categorize

  • what we regard as normative
  • what people think is normative in one culture

→ Information consistent with stereotypes will be

  • given more attention
  • rehearsed more often
  • → remembered better

positive Stereotypes
// Benevolent Sexism/Racism/...


→ both forms, positive & negative stereotypes legitimize discrimination against the group in question

Explicit
conscious prejudice decline

Implicit
unconscious negative feelings

Discrimination
unjustified negative or harmful action toward a member oif a group solely because of his/her membership to the group

Stereotypes
a generalization of a group in which certain traits are assigned to virtually all members regardless of actual variation between members

official

Subtle

Microaggression
small but offensively experienced expressions in daily communication

Social Distance
a person's reluctance to "get to close to a group"

microinvalidations
ignoring/excluding/devaluing thoughts/feelings/perception of others

microinsults
complimenting people that seem foreign for their good language skills

microassaults
explixit attacks

Causes

Social Identity
part of persons self-concept that is based on his/her identification with the belonging to a certain group or other social affiliation

In-Group-Bias
the tendency to favor members of the own group over people who belong to other groups

  • both in temporal & trivial groups AND long-lasting & important groups
  • minimla groups

Ethnocentrism
cultural or ethnic bias:
the belief that one's own culture is superior to others // lives the correct way of living

Outgroup Homogeneity
the perception that individuals in the out-group are more similar to each other (homogenous)than members of the in-group are

Blaming the victim
the tendency to blame individuals (make dispositional attributions) for their victimization, typically motivated to see the world as a fair place


  • the stronger the belief in a fair world, the more the tendency to blame the individuals
    → often happens for people who rarely experienced discrimination

Discrimination of Technology

Racial Stereotypes in HRI

Gender Stereotypes in HRI

Male Robot


participants were:

  1. ascribe more agency related traits
  2. seeing the female robot as more capable for stereotypical male tasks
  3. more likely to choose a math task to work on together with the robot than a verbal task

Pro's

  • comfort with stereotypes
  • trust
  • ability to break stereotypes

Con's

  • reinforce stereotypes
  • trust-issues
  • hard to identify long-term effects
  • need of stepping up against discrimination
    • how to reach out to the engineer
      (feeling of F* the system)
    • can machine learning help with this?

Probable Solutions

Definitions

Race
refers to physical differences that groups and cultures consider significant


→ no biological/scientific basis for race

Ethnicity
shared cultural characteristics such as language, ancestry, practices and beliefs

Robot Characteristics-Design
rating robots based on their

  • likability
  • threat
  • dominance
  • familiarity
  • human likeness
  • mechanical appearance

Threat
Asian & Arab > White & Asian

Likability
White & Asian > Asian / Arab

Robot Shooter Bias


  1. participants were quicker to shoot an armed Black agent than an armed White agent / simultaneously faster to refrain from shooting an unarmed White than an unarmed Black agent
    → regardless of whether human or robot


  1. short response window with accuracy instead of latency
    similar to experiment 1: participants were faster to not shoot at an unarmed White than an unarmed Black agent - No shooter bias on error rates

Female Robot


participants were:

  1. ascribe more communal related traits
  2. seeing the female robot as more capable for stereotypical female tasks
  3. equally likely to choose a math task or a verbal task to work on together with the robot

Discrimination By Technology
in HRI

Biased Components

  • sensors are biased for white skin color
  • NLP is biased for male voices
    NLP is biased against dialects, slang, childrens voice, older adult's voice

Biased Adaption
robot might unintentionally favor one group member over another
based on

  • components
  • performance
  • beter training data for specific users

Results

  • Intergroup Bias
  • Social Exclusion
    → severe negative outcomes for the emotional state of the individual and the social dynamics of the group

Social Consequences



→ Attend, Appraise and Attribute
→ Need Fortification
→ if ostracism episodes persist over extended time


  1. Resignation Stage
    → Depleted Resources - Inability to Fortify Needs

Temporal Need-Threat Model
Williams 2009

1.
Minimal Signal


  • Detection of Ostracism

Need Threat
(belonging, self-esteem, ontrol, meaningful existence

2.
Reflexive Stage


Pain
Negative Affect (sadness/anger)

3.
Reflective Stage


-> Attend, Appraise and Attribute

  • meaning
  • relevance
  • motives

-> Need fortification

if ostracism episodes persist over extended time


  1. Resignation Stage
    Depleted Resources - Inability to Fortify Needs
    (alienation, depression, helplessness, unworthiness)

multi-identity robots/systems

  • one distributed system for multiple robots
  • one robot with multiple identities


robots that fit the personalized expectations of the user/user groups
→ would need to use stereotypes to tailor behavior -> fosters stereotypes

In-Group designers
having more diverse// more specified in-group designers within the process of design

Designing against established structural Discrimination

Should we Build it?

Nothing about us, without us!
nihil de nobis, sine nobis

Dual Use Problem

IBM & the 2nd world ar

Consensus

Germany Consensus

US Consensus

For

  • racial distinguishment
  • organization of concentration camps

US internment camps of japanese citizens

  • locator files

Human mobility

  • Check-ins (Foursqaure, Gowalla, Twitter, …)
  • The Amsterdam Real Time Project
  • Real Time Urban Monitoring
  • Social Sensing via RFID (SocioPatterns)

Analysis of political conversations

For

  • railways
  • money
  • ...

examples

disabled humans

skin-detection for dark skins

Design

decision

  • designer (team)
  • researcher

affected
diverse

  • Users
  • Readers
  • viewers
  • algorithms
  • ...

blinking vs asians

africans as gorillas

WHY?

non-diverse team

non-diverse training data

recognition of female vs male voices

click to edit

exclusion of

  • gender
  • age
  • disabilities
  • ethnicities
  • identities
  • ...
    //
  • socio-economic standards
  • languages spoken
  • profession
  • interests
  • behavior
  • knowledge
  • orientation
    • sexual
    • religious
    • political

What to do?

  1. identify groups
  2. ask in which way they could be in an adavntage/disadvantage

ideas

  • ability to choose how you personally want to use the service
  • //focus on specific customer groups (?)
    • common practice

autism-unfriendly websites

Smaller Questions

• „Should someone be included as a part of a large aggregate of data?

• What if someone’s ‘public’ blog post is taken out of context and analyzed in a way that the author never imagined?

• What does it mean for someone to be spotlighted or to be analyzed without knowing it?

• Who is responsible for making certain that individuals and communities are not hurt by the research process?

• What does informed consent look like?“ (Boyd and Crawford 2014)

cod