Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Reference 6: WHO debate - Coggle Diagram
Reference 6: WHO debate
Debate Proposition
What is it?
statement that expresses a judgement or opinion. In a debate, one side supports the proposition and the other side opposes the proposition :checkered_flag:
Summary: WHO wants to oppose the idea of high cost insulin affecting low income families by approving and certifying generic versions of insulin to increase the improve worldwide accessibility
Opening Statement
What is it?
identifies the viewpoint being represented and outlines the arguments that will be made in the debate. both sides of a debate make an opening statement :checkered_flag:
WHO will approve and certify generic versions of insulin to expand access of insulin to individuals with diabetes
increasing accessibility to generic drugs will reduce the inequalities seen between developed and developing nations, especially those in developed nations who do not have access to health insurance
-
-
Argument One
-
in the past, approving generic drugs has led to an immense success
-
Argument Two
What is it?
includes the same components of the first argument, but centers around a different evidence to support the viewpoint; starts with a rebuttal to what the opposing side has said :checkered_flag:
-
-
over 35 years, diabetic diagnosis has quadrupled to over 400 million
-
there is a lack of affordable insulin which affects the vulnerable individuals who can face blindness, vascular issues, amputations, stroke, and premature death :star:
Closing Statement
What is it?
provides each side of the debate; summarizes their arguments to reinforce the point of view :checkered_flag:
the system set in place worsens the diabetic crisis and because of this, those with low income will suffer the most
believes that there is strong evidence that generic drugs can improve health :star:; morally, generic drugs should be approved for intake
-
-