As management, especially HRM, has been pointing out, it is not geared towards discovering ideal organizational models or techniques.
The HRA approach is situational or contingent, a model considered ideal in one situation may be totally inappropriate in another.
Every company as a social unit, as an organization, must be managed following the most appropriate techniques, models and principles according to the particular situation, whether when planning, organizing, coordinating, directing or controlling.
For an organizational role to have meaning for people, it must include:
a) Specific and verifiable objectives, which constitute an important part of planning
b) A clear idea of the main duties or activities
c) An unspoken area of discretion or authority so that the person fulfills a function knows what he can do to achieve the goals.
The viable organizational structure cannot be static, therefore there is no way or model to organize that works better in all kinds of situations.
The effective organizational structure depends on the situation.
According to Koontz and Weihrich (1996, p.257), the organizing process consists of the following steps:
• Set clear business goals
• Formulate objectives, policies and support plans
• Identify and classify the activities necessary to achieve them
• Group these activities according to the human and material resources available, and the best way to use them, according to the circumstances
• Delegate to the head of each group the necessary authority to carry out the activities
• Link groups horizontally and vertically, through authority relationships and information flows.
Some of the most common mistakes in the organization are:
• Inability to plan properly: It is not unusual to find a company that maintains a traditional organizational structure long after its objectives, plans, and external environment have changed.
• Inability to clarify relationships: probably more than any other mistake, the inability to clarify relationships in the organization is the cause of friction, politicking and inefficiency; It implies a lack of knowledge of the tasks that the members of a company team must perform.
• Inability to delegate authority: A common complaint in organizational life is that managers are reluctant to refer decision-making to the lower levels of the organization.
• Misuse of functional authority: Perhaps more dangerous for good administration are the problems caused by the indefinite and unlimited delegation of functional authority.
• Excess and lack of organization: excess organization is caused by the inability to put into practice the idea that the company's structure is a system that enables efficient staff performance.
Administrators overorganize when they multiply activities and “staff” departments when they appoint unnecessary line assistants, excess procedures, excess work committees for decisions that can be made by one person (Koontz and Weihrich, 1996, pp.318 -322).