Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Breakdowns in Implementing Models of Organization Change - Coggle Diagram
Breakdowns in Implementing Models of
Organization Change
Theories
Life Cycle Process Theory (Regulated Change)
A life cycle model depicts the method of amendment as progressing through a prescribed sequence of stages and activities over time..
Activities in a lifestyles cycle version are prescribed and controlled with the aid of using natural, logical, or institutional routines
In most organizational applications of a life cycle model, recurrent changes in efficient and effective ways
Teleological Process Theory (Planned Change)
A teleology or planned change model views development
Goal formulation, implementation, evaluation, and modification of an envisioned end state
Based on what was learned or intended by the people involved.
Dialectic Process Theory (Conflictive Change)
Dialectical theories give an explanation for balance and extrade in phrases of the relative stability of strength among opposing entities.
Stability is produced via struggles and accommodations
Change happens while challengers advantage enough energy to confront and interact incumbents.
Evolutionary Process Theory (Competitive
Change)
Variations he introduction of novel form are frequently regarded as rising with the aid of using blind or random chance.
Selection occurs principally through competition among forms
clients or better degree selection makers pick out the ones bureaucracy which can be first-class proper for the useful resource base of an environmental niche
Evolutionary extrade unfolds as a recurrent and probabilistic development of variation, selection, and retention activities
Contingency Propositions on Breakdowns and
Remedies
Dialectical processes of change apply when different organizational units conflict and confront one another on an issue.
Dialectics fail due to dysfunctional methods of conflict resolution and power inequalities that limit or inhibit confrontations among opposing parties.
Regulated life cycle models are appropriate for managing many recurrent and predictable organizational changes in efficient and effective ways
They break down when the rules are wrongly designed and when people or units resist implementing the change mandates, resulting in sabotage
A teleological model of planned change applies when a group of participants agrees on and moves toward a shared organizational goal.
The model breaks down when participants cannot reach consensus on a goal or when the conclusions reached are subject to individual and group biases
Evolutionary processes of variation, selection, and retention apply when multiple units within or between organizations compete for scarce resources by developing different methods of products for a given market
Evolution breaks down when variations are homogeneous and when resources are munificent or competition is low.
Complexities of Interacting Models, Agents,
and Changes
Change Agents with Different Mental Models.
Person differences, experiences, and function responsibilities, it's miles widely recognized that alternate dealers and contributors have specific interpretations and intellectual fashions of a given alternate system wherein all of them participate
Relations Among Models.
While it could be beneficial to undertake a reflective approach of moving our intellectual fashions to suit the temporal contexts of extrade methods unfolding in an organization.
Interdependent Organization Changes
Many extrade methods are embedded and nested in complicated organizational systems. Fortunately, the sizable majority of those adjustments are recurrent and observe exercises prescribed via way of means of a existence cycle (regulated) technique version with out an awful lot trouble or attention.
Model Strengths and Weaknesses
breakdown of resistance to mandated changes in a life cycle model can often be remedied by involving the people affected in a teleological model of planning and goal setting.
Breakdowns in one model can also contribute to breakdowns in other models of change.
If participants are unable or unwilling to reach consensus on a goal after several attempts to do so
The goal developed by a group with a teleological model may explain the emergence of the antithesis in the dialectical model
The source of variation in an evolutionary model is often the synthesis produced through dialectical struggle.
Model Temporal Relations
Discussed, each model of change represents a possible link in understanding the temporal stages or cycles of organizational change.
Balancing Tensions and Oppositions
Number of these tensions, including whether a change initiative is triggered by internal or external forces, open or closed to stakeholder participation