Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Figure 1 Method framework answers the question. - Coggle Diagram
Figure 1 Method framework answers the question.
Online Questionnaires
(3)Finally a total of 404 participants were recevied from 26/April/ 2023 to 31/May/2023
(2)Criteria of participants. All members of NTOU include students, teachers, professors, and administration
(1)Question
(1.1) Agree? OWF generating clean energy affects fishery, MEBE but coexists with fishing, marine aquaculture to increase fishery and biodiversity.
(1.2) Agree? MSP site selection for OWF multiple uses and marine EIA reduce the impact on the fishery livelihood and MEBE.
(1.3) Agree? the regulations of MSP, marine EIA insurance, incentives, specific funds feedback, and compensation of OWF could improve fishery livelihood and protect MEBE.
(1.4)Agree? energy policy allows public financial participation in OWF.
Semi-structure interview
(1)Criteria of the participant. Total 5 Departments and Institutes in NTOU related to the research questions.
(2)Target 20 participants. Finally, only 9 successful participants. 3 face-to-face recorded interviews. 6 social media recorded file interviews from 26/April/2023 till 31/May/2023
(3)Interview questions
Q1. What are your views about OWF affecting fishery livelihood and the MEBE? And Why? How will you deal with these impacts?
Q2. What are your views about MSP site selection and EIA reducing the impact on the fishery livelihood and protecting MEBE? And Why?
(4)Data analysis. transcript, labeling, coding, category, and interpretation answer the research question.
1.On line data collection
(4)YouTube
Artificial reef for fishing
Offshore wind farms multiple uses
Marine aquaculture
(2)Government website
Energy Policy
Fishery Research Institute (FRI)
(5)Google scholar, journal review
(1)United Nation website
(3) Academic website. National Taiwan Ocean University