Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Racism - Coggle Diagram
Racism
What is Race?
-
social scientists, ‘race’ is generally understood as a social
-
-
-
-
social reality. Indeed, historical variation in the definition and
-
-
-
Later, in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, as Europeans encountered non-European civilizations, Enlightenment
-
They applied the term to plants, animals, and humans as
a taxonomic subclassification within a species. As such, race
became understood as a biological, or natural, categorization
-
slavery expanded, the concept was used to justify and prescribe
exploitation, domination, and violence against peoples racialized as nonwhite. Today, race often maintains its ‘natural’
connotation in folk understandings; yet, the scientific
-
-
between ‘racial’ groups, common phenotypic markers exist on
a continuum, not as discrete categories, and the use and
significance of these markers varies across time, place, and even
within the same individual (Fiske, 2010).
For most social scientists, ‘race’ is distinct from ‘ethnicity’.
-
-
physical characteristics, which are thought to be fixed, whereas
ethnicities are defined by perceived common ancestry, history,
and cultural practices, which are seen as more fluid and
-
-
-
social scientists, ‘race’ is generally understood as a social
-
-
-
-
social reality. Indeed, historical variation in the definition and
-
-
-
Later, in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, as Europeans encountered non-European civilizations, Enlightenment
-
They applied the term to plants, animals, and humans as
a taxonomic subclassification within a species. As such, race
became understood as a biological, or natural, categorization
-
slavery expanded, the concept was used to justify and prescribe
exploitation, domination, and violence against peoples racialized as nonwhite. Today, race often maintains its ‘natural’
connotation in folk understandings; yet, the scientific
-
-
between ‘racial’ groups, common phenotypic markers exist on
a continuum, not as discrete categories, and the use and
significance of these markers varies across time, place, and even
within the same individual (Fiske, 2010).
For most social scientists, ‘race’ is distinct from ‘ethnicity’.
-
-
physical characteristics, which are thought to be fixed, whereas
ethnicities are defined by perceived common ancestry, history,
and cultural practices, which are seen as more fluid and
-
-
-
social scientists, ‘race’ is generally understood as a social
-
-
-
-
social reality. Indeed, historical variation in the definition and
-
-
-
Later, in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, as Europeans encountered non-European civilizations, Enlightenment
-
They applied the term to plants, animals, and humans as
a taxonomic subclassification within a species. As such, race
became understood as a biological, or natural, categorization
-
slavery expanded, the concept was used to justify and prescribe
exploitation, domination, and violence against peoples racialized as nonwhite. Today, race often maintains its ‘natural’
connotation in folk understandings; yet, the scientific
-
-
between ‘racial’ groups, common phenotypic markers exist on
a continuum, not as discrete categories, and the use and
significance of these markers varies across time, place, and even
within the same individual (Fiske, 2010).
For most social scientists, ‘race’ is distinct from ‘ethnicity’.
-
-
physical characteristics, which are thought to be fixed, whereas
ethnicities are defined by perceived common ancestry, history,
and cultural practices, which are seen as more fluid and
-
-
-
social scientists, ‘race’ is generally understood as a social
-
-
-
-
social reality. Indeed, historical variation in the definition and
-
-
-
Later, in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, as Europeans encountered non-European civilizations, Enlightenment
-
They applied the term to plants, animals, and humans as
a taxonomic subclassification within a species. As such, race
became understood as a biological, or natural, categorization
-
slavery expanded, the concept was used to justify and prescribe
exploitation, domination, and violence against peoples racialized as nonwhite. Today, race often maintains its ‘natural’
connotation in folk understandings; yet, the scientific
-
-
between ‘racial’ groups, common phenotypic markers exist on
a continuum, not as discrete categories, and the use and
significance of these markers varies across time, place, and even
within the same individual (Fiske, 2010).
For most social scientists, ‘race’ is distinct from ‘ethnicity’.
-
-
physical characteristics, which are thought to be fixed, whereas
ethnicities are defined by perceived common ancestry, history,
and cultural practices, which are seen as more fluid and
-
-
-
social scientists, ‘race’ is generally understood as a social
-
-
-
-
social reality. Indeed, historical variation in the definition and
-
-
-
Later, in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, as Europeans encountered non-European civilizations, Enlightenment
-
They applied the term to plants, animals, and humans as
a taxonomic subclassification within a species. As such, race
became understood as a biological, or natural, categorization
-
slavery expanded, the concept was used to justify and prescribe
exploitation, domination, and violence against peoples racialized as nonwhite. Today, race often maintains its ‘natural’
connotation in folk understandings; yet, the scientific
-
-
between ‘racial’ groups, common phenotypic markers exist on
a continuum, not as discrete categories, and the use and
significance of these markers varies across time, place, and even
within the same individual (Fiske, 2010).
For most social scientists, ‘race’ is distinct from ‘ethnicity’.
-
-
physical characteristics, which are thought to be fixed, whereas
ethnicities are defined by perceived common ancestry, history,
and cultural practices, which are seen as more fluid and
-
-