• Hamilton v ACC Loan Management: Hamilton senior died leaving his property to his family. When his wife died, she transferred the disputed lands to her son (her other son was farming the land at that time). Son had been granted a loan by ACC to assist in buying part of the farm which was part of the farmland owned by his late father. Part of the security over the land came from the mother. The other brother (farmer) did not know of this transfer until 2013 (21 years after his father died) when he saw a for sale sign for the lands when his brother was in bankruptcy, and applied to ct claiming AP. Ct looked at the 12 year continuous period to ascertain whether there was exclusive possession of the lands to establish an intention to possess the land itself; and was the period of possession interrupted by any act of his mother? On appeal, it was stated that no other individual occupied the land other than the p. Evidence of this included the fact he had his cattle on the land, and had his own herd number, applied for various grants and payments, and he was the only child with an interest in farming. It was concluded that he treated the lands as his own lands and did so for the required period of 12 years, and that he had the necessary intention to possess the lands to the exclusion of all others, and that this was not a case where his possession of the land was temporary or sporadic, but it was permanent and exclusive, and he had the necessary level of physical control over the lands.