Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
CORPORATIONS Lesson 21, the power to decide (directly for matters falling…
CORPORATIONS Lesson 21
Types of conflicts
-
Investors vs. managers
the decisions of the shareholders are taken by majority vote, sometimes particularly qualified, calculated according to the shares in the capital (so-called plutocratic principle).
the minority of control
the exercise of control over the company does not necessarily require the possession of a majority shareholding in the capital. there are instruments that make it possible to reduce the investment necessary to exercise control:
- excluded or limited voting shares
- purchase of own shares
- reciprocal shareholdings
- chain groups, etc
The real distinction, therefore, does not run between majority and minority ontologically understood, but between the partners who have control of the social enterprise and those who, being excluded from it, limit themselves to financing it with risk capital.
-
-
-
-
The grups
risk for the creditors within the groups:
- segmentation of liability
- less significance for the single balance sheet of the subsiadiary
Relationship among groups and minority shareholders
- longer the group chain lesser the control power of minority shareholders
-
- the interest of the group many times is different form the interest of the subsidiary, with less power control of the subsidiary representant, the interest of the group prevail
- leverage effect
-
-
-
the power to decide (directly for matters falling within the competence of the partners; indirect for those matters falling within the competence of the directors) is placed in favor of those who have the residual claim: among the various classes of interested parties, it is this one which, by virtue of the residual claim, has the greatest incentive to create value.