Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Blondes to Die out in 200 years BBC NEWS Friday 27 September 2002 11:51…
Blondes to Die out in 200 years
BBC NEWS
Friday 27 September 2002
11:51 GMT 12:15 UK
What ethical issues were raised by the article?
No Update on Studies last published in 2002
Researchers and Facilities are not identified. Who are these so-called "experts,"?
Published on a Major News Outlet conspiring to one agenda
One opposing view as the individual Identified under the name of Jonathan Reese. But no other sources cited confirming such studies for Blonds nor other article sources.
Your reaction to the ethical issues raised by the information in the article.
Why are the laboratories and scientists not identified running these studies?
Why are bottled blondes only representing its data table. There have been many parents that have both brown/ black hair and have had children with blond hair.
Using bottle blondes to make an argument have no such place on a study that is focusing on genes and geographical location.
Play devils advocate, what opposing view could be expressed.
How is this even a legit study. It could be a completely bogus study with such, "experts," not identfied. Oddly enough the opposer of such research is Jonathan Reese professor of Dermatology at the University of Edinburg.
Such studies can be falsified to bring PR to a school or the Professor for more publicity. Possible publicity stunt for revenue.
Why is this article not archived in BBC News. It is a major news outlet, it has not been updated since. Such articles from a major news outlet should have been archived in its 2020 website, and why is this 2002 website not taken down yet?
What is your opinion about the issue, and what caused you to form that opinion?
My opinion is that coming from a major news source which has a specific agenda to keep readers engaged, how true
is such study when none of the researchers are cited besides the opposer.
I see this as much as a publicity stunt to make a name for the school and teacher. No such research would compare artificial data to that of what it is studying. The researchers are comparing human genes to that of beauty products. I would like to state that there was no controlled focus group.
How could using a balance in research and reporting tactics have made a difference in the outcome of what was reported
identifying who was involved in the research and facilities.
Having volunteers of such study be interviewed.
Stating blondes are dying out due to genes but then oppose artificial blonds which use hair color, how does that compare to a gene study? It then becomes click bait. It would have been more acceptable to study different genes of people in Germany. Studying and comparing genes, and what about those with parents that have no blond hair but a child that does?
Is this specifically targeting ethnicities?