Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

ESS, Charles. Digital Media Ethics: Overview,Frameworks, Resources. ESS,…

- - - - +/- consenquences
    - - util
        
        pleasure X pain
      - values of people?
        
        no assigned value
    - - short-term X long-term consequences
      - next few hours VS 24h look into future
        
        where is the line
    - - number of people
        
        war -ex. 200,000deaths VS end of war (Japan).
        
        contaminated area
  - - - pacifism can be supported by consequentilialism
        
        harm is contradictory to good and ability of judgement (phronesis)
      - pursued life of contentment (eudaimonia) and harmony
    - - absolute quality
      - often religiously grounded
        
        religious pacifists
        
        killing a human being is always bad (even in self-defense)
      - rationalist deontologies
        
        Kant
        
        Categorical Imperative
        
        impossible promises
      - -"greater good"
        
        enslavement
  - - - previous frameworks based on male prespective
    - - pre-conventional morality
        
        reward-good X punishing-bad schema
        
        pre-adolescence
      - conventional morality
        
        values, practices, expectations in society,
        recognizing individual rights
        
        young adolescence
      - post-conventional morality
        
        ethical autonomy
        
        conscious responsibility
        
        use of reason
    - - relationships
        
        emotive distinction
        
        ethics of care
  - - - global ethics
    - - what we ought to do to be excellent human beings
        
        becoming a human being
        
        the best version
    - - eudaimonia=happiness
        
        practical reason
        
        -to do the "right" thing
        -phronesis (practical judgement to discern the right choice)
        
        learning from mistakes
  - - - self identity of individual human being is a western concept (peach pitt)
        
        body is different than the pitt (it can change during years)
      - in confucian- humans are relational beings (always same)
        
        onions- different layers- different concepts of relationships
        
        Tian (order)
- - - - no universally valid ethical norms/values
    - - no need to have a universal validity
    - - tolerance as a universal value (NO universal values)
      - paralysis of moral judgement
        
        tolerance of rape in other cultures...
        
        moral isolationism
        
        intermixing of culures
        
        cultural changes
        
        "3rd. culture"
  - - - there are values/norms valid for everyone
        
        but there is not SINGLE set of values
    - - different contexts
        
        different application
        
        agreement on a community well-being
  - - - we know these values
        
        different values from the universal ones are WRONG