Global Pessimism
The basics
Three responses to globalisation (according to Seabrook)
Ha-Joon Chang
Jeremy Seabrook
Cohen and Kennedy (2000)
Suggest that cultural pessimists under-estimate the strength of local cultures – they note that people do not generally abandon their cultural traditions, family duties, religious beliefs and national identities because they listen to Madonna or watch a Disney film. Rather, they appropriate elements of global culture, and mix and match with elements of local culture, in much the same way as the citizens of the USA and Britain.
Globalisation is happening and it benefits the West more than the rest
Globalisation is a one way process in which Western institutions and ideas are imposed on the rest of the world
Globalisation is a negative phenomenon, a form of Western, mainly American imperialism
Reasserting local identities
Violent resistance
Fatalism
The belief that all events are predetermined and therefore inevitable
Seabrook suggests that globalization sweeps aside the multiple meanings human societies and cultures have derived from their environments.
Globalisation suggests a more superior and civilised way of living
This marginalises and diminishes local culture
Argues that neoliberals paint a false picture of the benfits of economic globalisation through the spread of neoliberal economic policy
He refers to the world bank, the IMF and the WTO as the 'unholy alliance'
They claim they exist to force developing countries down the free-trade road