Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
UNIT 6: PHILOSOPHY OF MIND - Coggle Diagram
UNIT 6: PHILOSOPHY OF MIND
PHILOSOPHY
THE PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH
DEDUCTIVE- APPLICATION OF RULES OF LOGIC TO STATEMENTS ABOUT THE WORLD
INDUCTIVE- DRAWING CONCLUSIONS BASED ON COMMONALITIES OBSERVED IN SPECIFIC INSTANCES
CONCEPTIAL INQUIRY
LOGIC OR LAW OF THOUGHTS
FUNDAMENTAL ISSUES RELATED TO LIFE,KNOWLEDGE,VALUES
SEARCH FOR WISDOM ➜INQUISITIVE MIND➜UNDERSTAND OURSELF BETTER
DETERMINE&FREE WILL
DETERMINISM- Determinism is a belief in the inevitability of causation. Everything that happens is the only possible thing that could happen. The chains and networks of causes are so powerful and inexorable that every outcome is inevitable.
FREE WILL - FREE TO MAKE GENUINELY UNDETERMINED CHOICES IN CIRCUMSTANCES
THE MIND-BODY PROBLEM
DUALISM
RENE DESCARTES- FACT THAT HUMAN DOES NOT PERISH WITH BODY&GOD EXIST
MIND(NON-PHYSICAL)
CONSIST OF SPRITUAK ESSENCE
IDEAS,KNOWLEDGE&INTELLINGENCE
QUALIA- THE WAYS THINGS SEEM TO US
BODY(PHYSICAL)
CONSIST OF PHYSICAL ESSENCE
EXPERIENCE WORLD THROUGH SENSE
CREATE UNIQUE IDENTITIES
ALWAYS DIVISIBLE
MATERIALISTIST
DEMOCRITUS- EVERYTHING IS EXIST IS MATERIAL OR PHYSICAL
REJECT DOCTORINES OF MATERIAL SUBSTANCES (DUALISM)
HUMANS ARE MADE OF ATOMS
THE MIND IS IDENTICAL TO BRAIN
MIND=BRAIN=BODY
DIFFERENT ASPECTS OF HUMAN, DIFFERENT SORT OF ATOMS
MONAD
MEANING: ONE
MADE TINY LIVING ELEMENTS
CREATED BY GOD
NOT INFLUENCE/INTERACT WITH EACH OTHER
MIIDN&BODY DO NOT INTERACT BUT THEY FUNCTION IN PARALLEL AS PART OF GOD'S PLAN
VON LEIBNIZ
PHILOSOPHY&NEUROSCIENCE
NEUORSCIENCE
EXPLAINING COGNITIVE PROCESS IN TERMS OF BRAIN MECHANISM
STRUCTURE&FUNCTION OF HUMAN BRAIN
PHILOSOPHY
UNIVERSE
MIND PROBLEM
MIND=BODY/SOUL➜MIND=BRAIN➜MIND=COMPLEXITY
SPLIT BRAIN
THE CASE OF SYNESTESIA
EEG, PET, fMRI and diffusion tensor imaging are among the most prominent techniques to research the structural and functional differences of synesthetic brains and those of non-synesthetes. Most of the studies that were done were focusing on sound -> color synesthesia and grapheme -> color synesthesia.
THE STUDY CASE SEVERE AMNESIA
THE IMPACTS
the inability to recall information stored in the long-term memory.
MEMORY
MINDBLINDEDNESS
AUTISM SPECTRUM DISODER
CHARACTERIZED AS FAILURE TO RELATE OTHE PEOPLE
INABILITY TO FUNCTION IN SOCIAL ARENA
The theory of mind (ToM) impairment describes a difficulty someone would have with perspective taking. This is also sometimes referred to as mind-blindness.
Theory of Mind is a person’s ability to attribute mental states such as feelings, thoughts, beliefs and intentions to oneself and others in order to understand, explain and predict social behaviour (Chevallier, 2013). This skill can often be undeveloped in people with Autism Spectrum Disorder but with support, theory of mind can be nurtured.
Research in psychotic disorders has developed a cognitive model of paranoid delusions involving abnormal causal attributions for negative events. Possible aetiologies of these include deficits in social reasoning, specifically ToM
PHILOSOPHY&LINGUISTIC
LINGUISTIC - INVESTIGATE THE HUMAN CAPASITY OF LANGUAGE
PHILOSOPY OF MIND-QUESTION ABOUT UNIVERSE&PROBLEMS RELATED TO FUNCTION MIND/BRAIN
CONNECTION-THOUGHT IN OUR MIND BEFORE IT BECOME LANGUAGE
WORDS&FRAMING OF CONCEPT-The framing effect is when someone reacts to a choice or concept based on how it is presented
TRUTH VALUES OF SENTENCES- TRUTH(DEPEND ON MEANING) AS COVEYED THROUGH LANGUAGE
LANGUAGE&THOUGHT
PHILOSOPHY&COGNITE SCIENCE
EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE
RENE DESCARTES
RATIONOLIST- THE MIND IS PRIMARY SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE
THEORY ➜HYPOTHESIS➜OBSERVATION➜CONFIRMATION
JOHN LOCKE
EMPIRICIST-KNOWLEDGE DRIVES ULTIMATELY FROM EXPERIENCE&SENSTATION
OBSERVATION ➜PATTERN➜OTENTATIVE HYPOTHESIS➜THEORY
IMMANUEL KANT
THE EMPIRICITS VIEW
EMPRICIAL KNOWLEDGE
THE RATIONALIST VIEW:KEY IDEAS
PHILOSOPHY&AI
WHERE IS THE INTELLINGENT COMES FROM?
Using findings drawn from genetics, neuroscience, primatology and literature, Coen suggests that as soon as the most basic stories arose, human intelligence would have been driven ever upwards through an arms race between honesty and deception in storytelling.
Through this process, humans became experts at detecting lies through contradictions. Science arose when those same skills in detecting falsehoods were applied to stories told about the natural world. By doubting those stories and testing them against observations, scientists could give better explanations about how the world works.
