how are mate preferences combined and used when selecting a mate
Eucledean model
treshold model
mate priority peference model
addative model
compensatory and non-compensatory debate
environment
pattern metric more predictive
the best model of how are preferences combined to asses attractiveness
In Jordan et al. 2020
compensatory
non-conpensatory as heuristics
to find out the actual preferences we need to pose budget on people
Recourse allocation model
luxuries and necessities
compensatory
if replicate thats who we choose
most reporductive value
compensatory
ST - neccesities
speed dating studies
we go more of necessities if the time is limited
Budget allocation study
low budget men put more to attractiveness then for high budget
low budget women more to intelligence and recourses
men put 21% to attractiveness in low budget and women only 10%
non-compensatory and that is why it is criticised
not that accepted
level and pattern
settle for first partner who exceeds the threshold and revise accordingly
where does commited love come into this
it was not even in the first threee by Jordan et al. 2020
multi-dimensional
set ideal and the partner with the shortest distance between ideal and actual
Jordan et al. 2020 - low difference between addative and this
add the value on all traits together
preferred by the participants