Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
The types of preferences humans poses - Coggle Diagram
The types of preferences humans poses
symmetry
Strategic pluralism theory (Gangestad x Simpson 2000)
more symmetrical female have more sexual partners and prefer more symmetrical male
more symmetrical male have more sexual partners and prefer ST
male of lower mate value prefer LT
waist to hip ratio
detection of pregnancy
facial symmetry and averages important
health cue and good genes
with that more intelligence as well
more sense of humor
more recourses
women do not value secondary sex factors as jawline and facial hair as much
more important in sex competition to establish dominance
Symmetry even more important if high pathogens levels Li et al. 2014
intelligence
acquisition of recourses
problem solving
simmilarity preference
need to be able to evaluate if mate is intelligent
educational endogamy and class endogamy
Buss x Schmitt 1993 - no motivation
Being more educated and having bigger recourses leads to bigger attraction
Johanson x Thomas 2022
sexual history
Thomas et al. 2017
we prefer some sexual past but not much
sexual past preference depends on mating strategy persued
Buss x Schmitt 1993
in ST men prefer more sexual experience because it signals easy access
in LT men prefer lower sexual experience
culturally dependent
in WIERD cultures chastity not as important
kindness
ambiguous term but high preference for it
to collaborate
to share recourses
men - women to fit in within his lifestyle
do not hurt me - aggression
social status
recourse acquisition
culturally dependent as well
if less emancipated women - bigger importance of recourses
Being more educated and rich leads to bigger attraction
Johanson x Thomas 2022
mutual mate choice model Thomas, Stewart- Williams (2013)
not that big differences between sexes
sexual dimorphism lower
man have preferences as well
big breast in women developed because men liked it
men liked it because it signals health and youth
men want LT because of paternity uncertainty and alliance
women developed adaptations based on these
women therefore need to decieve as well
mutual courtship
because more importance of nuclear family and bi-parental care
babies underdeveloped and women vulnerable when pregnant and lactating
Buss et al. 2004
men now want recourses as well
the previous research does not account for love
commited love
attachments
differences in circulation of testosterone after becoming a father
more inclining towards nuclear family
Sexual strategies theory Buss x Schmitt 1993
Preferences depend on the sexual strategy chosen and its function
men ST
wanna impregnate women - attractiveness and fertile window
relax their standarts a bit
more sexual experience - more promiscuity
women ST
wanna immediately extract recourses
Thomas and Stewart- Williams 2017
women presented with wealth cues chose more ST
wanna access potential LT mates
not that relaxed standarts
want protection from other male
genetical fitness , attractiveness
women LT
recourses
commitment
men LT
more about potential reproductive success then fertility
still a lot to attractiveness
no as promiscuous
Based on environmental factors
sex ratio
more pathogens - more symmetry
more need for bi-parental care more recourses needed
preference for chastity culturally determined
religion
danger
Life history theory
more offsprings
lower PI
based on family
Blesky et al. 2010
absent father daughters higher on SO
Buss 1989
Sex differences culturally universal
37 countries
Korea, Japan, Neatherlands
species or sex universal ??
bias
Cheerleader effect