Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
How can we learn about differing views about what constitutes an effective…
- How can we learn about differing views about what constitutes an effective leader by analyzing authors' discussions on reason? (effective leadership characterized as the ability to maintain peace and harmony in a state)
- What are the qualities of an effective leader? (related to knowledge)
-
-
Hobbes, Leviathan
-
authority/leadership is necessary for enforcement; without this, the "natural state of man" of chaos will ensue + threaten the maintenance of the commonwealth;
-
the sovereign's role is to ensure that what is agreed upon in the social contract is observed by all + regulated by him
Maimonides
leaders must evaluate "natural"/inherent differences in society and decide what actions/"moral habits" can still be reinforced to keep order in the society
-
everyone is equal in ability/able to obtain a capacity for knowledge and reasoning for the maintenance of a good society
glory? piety?
-
does the ruler possess genuine piety? if so, how does that improve their leadership? relationship between genuine piety and their effectiveness as a ruler? vs a demonstration/facade of piety and how is that tied to effective leadership
ex: Chrisitne talks about piety as one of the virtues of a leader, Aquinas; diff to Machiavelli (calls it a virtue, but says you just need to seem to possess it
spinoza, piety as adhering to natural laws? encouraging people to love their neighbor? forcing ppl to love thier neighbor? diff from being a champion of the new testament;
-
Locke
even in a state of nature without a sovereign, you can still use natural laws to appeal to/defense of actions until you have a society w/ a sovereign; can still get things in your own power to done
-
more explicit about idea of this being in each individual as a rational being; as rational beings, we have the ability to reason to these natural ideas;
-