Asset & Network Flexibility

asset type

Assets (capacity portfolio)

Capacity type:

Flexbility

Automation (usually limits flexibility)

anything that takes irreversible investment to acquire/build and that is needed in some quantity to produce/deliver a certain number of goods/services

Land/ Facilities/ Buildings

Equipment/ Machinery

Employee relationships

Supplier, Distributor relationships (contracts + trust)

Technology/ IT

Routines/ Procedures/ Organisation

Lower Ck/C0
[marginal capacity cost/ fixed capacity cost]

the amount of these assets and when & where you have them matter

as they are needed for production (with the right capabilities) to meet the demand (for a specific value proposition)

we consider the flexibility of the assets & the network

(capacity/location of a set of assets, with network flexibility resulting from the flexibility of assets and the way they are connected through transportation).

Specialised assets can be used only for a limited no. of activities

and often deliver high quality & speed at a low cost

Flexible assets can be used for a wider range of activities

and facilitate the production of a wide range of products/ sercives & adaptation to change

~ 2 Possible Benefits

1) Deliver flexibility as a capacity

2) Provide economies of scale & mitigate the challenges of uncertainty

(pooling, contingent allocation, information updating)

which matters to customers, because they care about variety/fit

Asset Flexibility

one asset can perform multiple tasks

e.g., 3D printer can print a wide variety of forms with different materials & limited changeover time.

but they are currently still expensive & slow

Value of flexibility in the Auto Industry

inflexible plant - only produce one car model

flexible plant - produces >1 model

avg. sales incentive $2691 in 2007

avg. sales incentive $3411 in 2007

Firms use pricing & production flexibility to adjust to changes in demand

costs of production flexibility are clear

but the benefits are harder to quantify

Moreno & Terwiesch empirical study

with

vehicles marketed in the US

period 2002 to 2009

348 models, 20,052 model-month observations

findings

deployment of flexibility is associated to:

increase in list prices

demand volatility associated to higher incentives

increase in utilisation

reduction of incentives

$200 to $700 per car

flexibility to produce what is in demand

less forecast error for sum

less excess capacity needed

flexibility more important when demand volatility is high

Common Categories

Scale or Volume Flexibility

Flexibility measures the ability to adapt or change. Upton

Scope, Mix or Range Flexibility

New Product Flexibility

The ability to increase or decrease the production rate of a particular product

(without a significant increase in cost or decrease in performance)

The ability to produce multiple products. This may refer to “simultaneous” production

e.g., different models produced at the same time on the same assembly line, or to the ability to easily switch production from one product to another.

The ability to introduce new products into the operating system

Agility (or response flexibility)

how fast can you change/switch

Robustness

is performance high across the range?

(sourcing, production and distribution)

Alignment with capabilities

agility needed when competing on timeliness & responsiveness

robustness needed when competing on quality and/or cost for a relatively high amount of variety

scope or mix flexibility needed for variety/fit strategies

scale or volume flexibility useful to produce at low cost with volatile demands

for more than one product

e.g., window installation business

Assets with high degree of automation (ability to produce with limited or no human supervision)

tend to be less flexible but could be higher-quality, faster and lower-cost

Obstacles

often unclear which features of a process must be changed to enhance its flexibility

flexibility is driven more by people & management (policies/ procedures/ culture) than by process structure

competition & customer perception may preclude using flexibility

flexibility costs more (investment, marginal production costs) but its benefits are difficult to measure, value (requires models with economies of scale & uncertainty) and convey

e.g., technology

e.g., using same assets to produce luxury & low-cost goods

How is it flexible?

Economies of scale EoS
(aggregating volumes)

even at higher investment costs & higher marginal production costs, one flexible facility can be less expensive than separate dedicated facilities (each with their own investment cost)

for a set of low volume products if there are some EoS (fixed cost, power function Capex with alpha < 1)

the sticking costs of one "flexible" plant could be lower than those of multiple dedicated ones

Risk Pooling
(aggregating volatilities, σ pool ≤ σ1 + σ2)

reduction in safety capacity (if it was positive to start with), proportional to risk pooling effectiveness

(1- 1/sqrt(N); decreasing returns)

increased revenues & fewer lost sales

reduced variance in profits

pooling effect in service queues is well known too

Allocation Flexibility

more than risk pooling

contingent decision-making

Information Updating

e.g., by first producing a product in a flexible facility, forecasts can be updated & decisions made later about whether to build a dedicated facility

flexibility allows the delay of key decisions & the collection of more information

asset flexibility makes variety and innovation more profitable (less costly for the same or better revenues

When is it most valuable?

When the product portfolio, volumes, and EoS favour a flexible asset

When it can help in managing uncertainty

Risk pooling

when demand uncertainties are high & comparable

i.e., when σ1 ≈ σ2

when the correlation between the various demands is small/ negative

Contingent allocation

when margins are different

allocation flexibility allows allocating more capacity to the higher margin product

Information Updating

when forecasts improve significantly with time & flexibility allows the postponement of production decisions

note: flexibility has to be less expensive than capacity as a solution!

use excess capacity if its cheap

otherwise, use flexibility

but remember, you need enough capacity to take advantage of flexibility

When flexibility offers alignment with your competitive positioning

When flexibility brings you closer to targeted spot on the efficient frontier

wide variety, high levels of customisation

speed to market

innovative products with short life cycles

same level of variety & innovation at lower cost

higher level of variety & innovation at lower cost

Network Flexibility

How much?

Flexibility is most effective if it creates long chains (a chain is a group of assets and products connected via links).

How to achieve flexibility with the network

Dedicated capacities

Resource sharing

Resource substitution
or hybrid network

Postponement
(delayed differentiation)

= asset flexibility

a common flexibility capacity for 2 products

requires less (but more expensive) safety capacity because of pooling

one flexible asset & one or two dedicated assets (typically for the lower-end product if only one)

this mix of flexible & dedicated assets can combine the pooling power of flexibility capacity with the lower investment cost of dedicated capacity

a little flexibility goes a long way

Delayed differentiation combines the advantages of product designs that have common components (demand pooling) and differentiator modules with a process

in which the differentiating elements are added at the end of the process in order to reduce the time between product specification and delivery (used in mass customization)

to decide how much of each types of capacities to install

first, find out the demand then allocate the flexible capacity to maximise profit

if demand exceeds capacity, sales are lost

Capacity can be moved along a chain to respond to demand fluctuations.

Products with negatively correlated demands need not be produced in the same plant.

e.g., for 10 plants, a configuration with 20 links can be nearly as effective as total flexibility if it constructs one large chain

A little bit of flexibility goes a long way if it creates a full chain and includes some excess capacity

Flexibility (capability) through product design (product technology)

Component commonality & platform sharing

e.g., one component now can be used in 5 different models

this allows the production of variety (5 models) at lower cost, higher conformance quality, faster response time, etc.

watch perceived quality!

Modular design
(as opposed to integral design)

e.g., instead of one component, we now create 5 different versions of this component

but all of them fit in all 5 original models, thereby creating 25 varieties

supports "mass customisation"

we can thus increase product variety without taking large hits in other capabilities

(cost, conformance quality, responsiveness)

Adaptable design

product can be changed easily (reversible/ irreversible) by designer/ manufacturer (for semi-custom designs), dealer, or customer to fit a variety of customer demands

e.g., software