Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

Literature Review: Understanding SLO for fire and forest management,…

- - - - Quality of contact strongly influences public acceptance of a company
        
        eg. Sinner et al. 2020's survey of aquaculture in NZ
- - - - Given this likely development, there is an important role for social research to play in developing our understanding of the different communities' perspectives and knowledge of current and future needs for landscape-wide fire management and potential Indigenous-led or collaborative fire management arrangements. Research could explore existing knowledge-cultures and community relationships/network dynamics in select community groups, key areas. This knowledge may have practical implications for planning and developing future collaboraive initiatives.
- - - - Sousa's global-scale review of wildfire literature notes a common research problem: "There is still no clear strategy for integrating the complexity arising from the multiple dimensions of wildfires"
      - A similar problem noted by other authors & scholars (eg. see McCaffrey, Petryna) who both note that a more "realistic" approach to this problem is to develop solutions that are responsive to/reflective of complexity of contemporary socio-ecological systems.
- - - - "This framework contributes to the development of a theory of IFM, examining the ontological, epistemological, and methodological issues within this evolving and dynamic phenomenon"
  - - - Safer Together policy FW
      - Shared responsibility (Victoria)
      - Shift involves many questions. Requires an understanding of many aspects of different communities and human behaviour so that fire agencies can assist and empower people to manage their bushfire safety (Ha
    - - North American research agenda emerged at similar time to that in Aus. Leading scholars incl. McCaffrey, key book: People, Fire & Forests: a summary of wildfire social science
      - Australian research largely funded by Bushfire CRC & its establishment of new research programs into community self-sufficiency for fire safety. Intention is to translate social research findings to fire agencies, to influence practical implementation (Handmer & Haynes 2008)
  - - - Barriers/obstacles to Indigenous ppls engagement and inclusion in contemporary bushfire or land management
        
        CITEEE note these barriers/obstacles Indigenous people must overcome are poorly understood in SE Aus = research need / GAP
        
        Empirical studies analyze processes and obstacles to meaningful and respectful engagement with TOs (Freeman 2021; Neale 2019)
      - Success factors to sustaining collaboration or partnership w TOs
        
        Iterative learning (Freeman 2021); Ongoing
        
        Interpersonal relationships
        
        Establishing and building trusting relationships built on recognition, respect and reciprocity (Costello & Cameron 2022)
        
        Recognition of knowledge holders and community for their knowledge exchange. Payment, or exchange of skills of resources that can benefit a community more than money (eg. Access to Country)
    - - Right-Way Research, Two-Way Learning
        
        Co-creating Fire Knowledge for Community and Landscape Resilience
      - “We argue that to adequately address the potential for Indigenous fire management to inform policy and practice in managing Southeast Australian forest landscapes, scientific approaches must be decolonized and shift from post-hoc engagement with Indigenous people and perspectives to one of collaboration between Indigenous communities and scientists” (Fletcher 2021).
      - Neale et al. 2019 develop theoretical FW to understand Indigenous-led or collaborative forms of environmental management as 'Decolonising experiments'
- - - - trust and social capital