Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
RWS v ACRES
dolphin case, Power of ACRES, improvements in
response of…
RWS v ACRES
dolphin case
-
-
Stakeholders
-
-
-
Stakeholder
coalitions
petition garnered a total of
11,000 signatures
-
-
800,000 petition
signed on charnge.org
and Avazz.org
-
RWS Customers
overall, the public mostly adopts a
neutral stance, "sitting on the fence"
because environmental conservation
is not their priority. Most are looking
out for recreation + entertainment
that RWS can provide for them
they feel less strongly about
the issue at hand
-
As a business, they
had the obligation
to uphold legal
responsibilities
breached legal recommendations when they
imported a batch of 20 dolphins in 2019, when
specification states that there cannot be more than 10
exported annually from Soloman Islands
-
Power of ACRES
Economic Impact
urged Mastercard to reconsider offering discounted tickets
to USS and stand united with animal activists
-
Media engagement
publicly published letters sent to RWS
on website, engaged audiences on
newspapers and internet forums
-
-
-
-