Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
W6 - B2 - CHAPTER 2 THE CLASSIC ARGUMENT FROM DESIGN (PALEY'S…
W6 - B2 - CHAPTER 2
THE CLASSIC ARGUMENT FROM DESIGN
(PALEY'S ARGUMENT)
Timothy Chappell
2.3- PALEY'S ARGUMENT
p.71
PALEY'S ARGUMENT
PREMISE
WATCH ORGA SO PRECISE
= MORE LIKELY TO BE DESIGNED
THAN ACCIDENT
SUBCONCLUSION
SO ALL NATURE'S FEATURES
DEMONHSTRATING PRECISE
ORGANISATION LIKE THIS
= EACH OF THEM MORE LIKELY
DESIGNED THAN ACCIDENT
MAIN CONCLUSION
SO NATURE MUST HAVE
A DESIGNER = GOD
OBJECTIONS
ASSUMPTION THAT
DESIGNER = GOD
NTHG IN PALEY'S ARGUMENT
SHOWS ONLY ONE GOD OR
THAT IT HAS FEATURES OF
TRADITIONAL GOD, p.72
THEORY OF
EVOLUTION, p.73-74
BLIND LAWS OF PHYSICS
THOSE WHO DO NOT
ADAPT DO NOT SURVIVE
DIRECTED EVOLUTION, p.75
GOD DIRECTING /
GUIDING EVOLUTION
WEAKER VERSION
EVOLUTION
HAPPENED BECAUSE GOD
MADE IT HAPPEN
STRONGER VERSION
INTELLIGENT DESIGN AND
FINE TUNING ARGUMENTS
(scientists)