Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Understanding Team Dynamics - Coggle Diagram
Understanding Team Dynamics
Team Charter - what is it?
a document that defines the purpose of the team, their values, how the team will work, and the expected outcomes
(aka) roadmaps created at the beginning to make sure that everyone involved are clear about where they're heading, and provide a sense of direction when times get tough
helps the team to not be strayed away from the purpose and objectives, and cultivate a healthy team dyamic
OUR team charter
Why use a team charter?
important to the development of
effective teamwork
,
member satisfaction
and
performance quality
lets the team discuss and agree on members expectations (related to behaviour), meeting management and allocation of work
to establish a
common frame
of reference/disagreements regarding
expectations
and goals
to the surface
establishing early
consensus
- which is critical in
combating dysfunction
in
task structuring, norm development and decision making
Tuckman's Stages off Group Development
Forming
team acquaints and establishes ground-rules
formalities preserved and members are treated as strangers
Storming
start to communicate their feelings but still view themselves as individuals (rather than part of a team)
some members resist control by group leaders and show hostility
Norming
members feel part of the team and realize that they can achieve work if they accept others' viewpoints
Performing
open and trusting atmosphere where flexibility is key and hierarchy is of little importance.
Adjourning
the team conducts assessment of the year and implements a plan for transitioning roles and recognizing members' contributions.
Conflict Mode Model - Thomas Kilmann
Competing
low cooperativeness, high assertiveness
direct communication / self oreintated
Pros
when a speedy solution is needed and we are a higher position of power
teammates spur constructively
lead to interesting innovations
focus on getting your perspective accepted
Cons
can results in animosity - hurtful feelings, stressful environment or hold grudges
Accommodating
high cooperativeness, low assertiveness
other-oriented, accept the perspective of the other party to call a truce
Pros
ideal when the conflict is a total waste of time
may seem like a good way to kill the heat for a moment
Cons
can lead to silencing of good ideas in order to appease (satisfy) others, which may lead to built-up resentment
Avoiding
low cooperativeness and also assertiveness
take a step back from the conflict to let it play out, the goal is to delay
Pros
feasible solution to a problem that seems impossible
ignoring the problem and focusing on the good can sometimes be the best way through it
some problems are super trivial and a waste of time
when cost of confrontation and resolution is far more than the cost of living with the conflict
Cons
least effective way as this simply dismisses the problem and neglects the need for solution
buries the conflict, may lead to more future ones
Collaborative
come together to create a mutually beneficial solution (win-win)
high cooperativeness, high assertiveness
Pros
best way to find solutions that benefit the entire team
built trust and respect within team members
used when both parties are on the same side, and are sensible or have similar authoritative power
Cons
everybody agrees with each other, extremely complacent, it can be difficult to decide what to do in the end/ come up with a single "best solution"
takes longer time, sometimes unrealistic
no obstacles or challenges to make people grow/learn
The 5 Dysfunctions of a Team