Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
"Arendt, Augustine, and Evil," Grumett - Coggle Diagram
"Arendt, Augustine, and Evil," Grumett
-
-
Augustine on evil
-
Later A: realizes "evil as negation" dn't account for origin of evil or activity contra divine design (157)
Ontologically, evil nonexistent; phenomenologically or relationally, existent (157)
Sin: "not a mere and simple aversion of the soul from higher to lower goods, but rather a continuing process given momentum by the force of habit" (Russell, qtd. 157)
"Once a particular sin is committed, its reappearance is more likely than before (157)
-
A's diagnosis of Rome's decline: greed, "willingness to have more than enough of any object of immoderate desire (157)
Sin = abandonment of highest good (God) for lower goods ("physical objects, temporal honour and power, and human friendship") (157)
"Appetitus, which in the dissertation seeks temporal possession for its own sake, leads to moral and social decline" (157)
A on theft of pears: pleasure not in pears, but in peers (158)
-
Common good NOT "consensus or majority view" but "unaltered" "most righteous laws of almighty God" (158)
"Coercive social power is based neither on nature nor on justice; it is rather a condition of slavery caused by sin" (158)
-
Arendt on Evil
Concept of "banality": predates Eichmann, appears "at least twice in The Origins of Totalitarianism" (159)
Eichmann: not a revelation for Arendt, but a testing ground (160)
The individual
-
-
"Arendt argues that Eichmann and those like him do not have evil natures, but lack certain fundamental human goods. They do not possess an evil will, but are deficient in good will" (160)
The social
"The spare time of the animal laborans is never spent in anything but consumption, and the more time left to him, the greedier and more craving his appetites" (Arendt, qtd. 161)
"Arendt sees modern (labouring and consuming) society as based on appetitus and having engendered moral collapse through its cupiditas (wrongly-directed desire) and inversion of the right order of eternal and temporal goods" (161)
-
-