Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Sieroka. (2014) "ASSESSING AND TESTING LANGUAGES FOR SPECIAL…
Sieroka. (2014) "ASSESSING AND TESTING LANGUAGES FOR SPECIAL PURPOSES" Cambridge scholars publishing, 69-84
Authenticity of the task
Bachman & Palmer(1996)
Input
Rubric of the text
Expected response
Relationship between input and response
Setting
Test
Type
Achievement
Check to see if the students have understood the material.
Diagnostic
Give details on your points of strength and weaknesses.
Proficiency
Give an overview of the pupils' knowledge with certification
Placement
Identify the group or level that potential learners should be in.
Characteristics
Authenticity
Correspondence of test task and language use
Interactiveness
Degree and type of involvement in doing the task
Impact
Positive and Negative influence of the test
Validity
External
Concurrent
Predictive
Internal
Content validity
Construct validity
Face validity
Practicality
Range of issues
Reliability
Consistency of test scores
Testing language for specific purposes
Specific purpose knowledge (Background knowledge)
Assessment
Formative aýssessment
Quiz
Essay
Anecdotal records
Diagnostic test
Lab reports
Summative assessment
Entrance exam
Final exam
Public examinations in Legal English
The Test of Legal English Skills (TOLES)
Foundation (A2-B1)
Higher (B1-B2)
Advanced (B2-C1) CEFR
International Legal English Certificate (ILEC)
B2 Intermediate (50-69%)
Merit C1, advanced (80-100% CAE)
C1 advanced (70-79%)
Fail (0-44%)
Maftuna Toshtanova