Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Gun Control pewpew , Offer opportunity for Rogerian argument - Coggle…
Gun Control
PRO-GUN CONTROL
Guns kill people
Ordinary conflicts escalate
Mass shootings are a result of a lack of gun control
Less accidental deaths with stricter gun control
Criminals wouldn't have access
Suicide rates would be lower with more gun control
Children would not have access
Reduces crime rates
The 2nd Amendment only refers to the militia
Most shootings occur with legal weapons
ANTI-GUN CONTROL
Many hobbies would not exist without guns
There are many other methods of violence
Many would be without jobs as a result of gun control
Any bans will not stop criminals
Crimes are less likely to occur where there is an armed security force
With gun control, people cannot defend themselves if necessary
Prohibition didn't stop alcohol consumption; it would be the same for guns
Infringes on the 2nd Amendment
People kill people
Offer opportunity for Rogerian argument
P-GC: Ordinary conflicts escalate
A-GC: No self-defense without guns
Guns can and will continue to be precursors to violence, as they are deadly weapons aimed to wound or kill. This being said, even with stricter laws around gun control, criminals can and will access guns. Barring the public from owning guns could prevent them from having a defense mechanism in a life-threating event.
P-GC: Reduces crime rates
A-GC: Criminals won't stop
Although making stricter laws for gun control could possibly reduce crime, criminals will not stop being criminals. Laws would make getting weapons harder for said criminals though.
