Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
For artists and natural scientists, which is more important: what can be…
For artists and natural scientists, which is more important: what can be explained or what cannot be explained?
What cannot be explained
-
Artists: explore inexplicable emotions, 言外之意
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
"Cannot" suggests "complete inability to", not "have yet to", although this distinction might not be terribly important
-
-
WHY
Artists – why it cannot be explained (because of the limitations of our language)
NS – why it cannot be explained (because our theories aren’t accurate enough)
-
ART
For artists, what cannot be explained is more important than what can be explained because:
-
-
As art explores emotions or evokes emotions or is an expression of emotion, which is inexplicable
-
-
-
-
-