Ausarbeitung: Small Worlds - Watts
general information
title
author
Small Worlds
Duncan J. Watts
is Associate Professor of Sociology at Columbia University and an external faculty member of the Santa Fe Institute. He holds a Ph.D. in theoretical and applied mechanics from Cornell University and is the author of Six Degrees: The Science of A Connected Age. He lives in New York City.
theory
description of regular and random network graph
random network graph
regular network graph
low average distance between nodes
low average clustering
high average distance between nodes
high average clustering
terms
average distance
clustering coefficent
average clustering
uniform way of clustering
random way of clustering
neither of these naive guesses were correct
prehistory and introduction
Stanley Milgram: experiment
goal: transmit letter from a Nebraskan farmer to an unknown Boston stockbroker with not that much ties by only usign connections on first-name-basis
perception: on average "six degrees of seperation"
small world
model
low average distance between nodes
high average clustering
models
general graph
m: neighbours
M: number of links
phenomenon
each one of us can reach a random celebrity with maximum six ties
terms that I dont understand till now
difference between alpha and beta graph; alpha 42-66, beta 66-70
1-lattice 34, 67
clustering coefficent 33
complete graph 102, 165
C. elegan graph 139, 153, 247, war das nicht mit der Stromversorgung?
centre of Hollywood, 145
characteristic path length, 12, 27-30, 34, 53 (alpha model), 67 (beta model), 116 (relational graph), 128-129 (spatial graph)
relational graph
spatial graph
computer simulations, game theory 204
construction algorithm, 46 & 244 (for alpha model), 67 (beta model), for o durchgestrichten omega? model 83; 223 (continious systems)
connectedness 50 (alpha model), 38 (random graphs)
degrees of seperation 4, 12
degree, 26; effective, 13, 105; variance of, 143
density (= Dichte) 15
edge 25 and edge complexity 90-91
graph distance, 127
graph models, 41
graph structure, 30
graphs, random 33m regular 27
local connectivity 187, 198
local length scale, in graphs, 89, 106, 114, 129, 242
Stanley, Milgram 4, 18, 23
path length, 12, 19, of graphs, 27- 30
Prisoner's Dilemma, 7, 200-204; differences between alpha and beta modell, 212
o durchgestrichen klein omega? 83-87
random connectivity, of social networks, 12-13, 243
N: number of nodes
three main models
third like omega
alpha graph
explanation
beta ß: high beta, high randomness
explaination
explanation
"embodies the random rewiring concept explicity and which unifies the properties of the alpha- and beta-models" (c. t. p. 6)
"motIvated by consideration of real social networks and how people actually make new acquaintances" (c. t. p. 6)
"motivated by simplicity of construction and the clean interpretation of its limiting cases" (c. t. p. 6)
classes of graphs
spatial graphs
relational graphs
"defining probability distributions have (effectively, for small n and k) a finite cutoff" p. 100
interdisciplinary phenomenons that can be explained by those models; beyond sociology
others at page 7 and 8
sociology & network theory
emergence and evolution of cooperative behaviours in large organisations, whose structural nature is allowed to vary
The formation and spread of fame, fads, and social movements
Told in a funny way: 'A rigorous proof that Kevin Bacon really is the centre of the civilised world, and, if not, who is?'
The spread of everything from computer viruses to infectious or sexually transmitted diseases
unnecessary of the strength of the human connections (also a weakness of the concept) in contrast to Granovetter's weak ties (inspiration p. 14)
theory of social networks ---- in general -- enumeration p. 18
- "statistical analysis of pathways through networks with varying degrees of local structure"
- "qualitative description of the structure of networks in terms of local (e. g. clustering) and nonlocal (e. g., weak ties) features.!
- "renormalisation of networks, viewed as meta-networks of highly clustered or equivalent subnetworks"
- embedding of networks into spaces where the coordinates are readily interpretable and relationships where the coordinates are readily interpretable and relationships between members can be more easily visualised
Stanley Milgram: psychologist
procedure, p. 18
- "Milgram sent a number of packets to agreeable "sources" in Nebraska and Kansas,
- with instructions to deliver these packets to one of two specific "target" persons in Massachusetts"
- "targets were named and described in terms of approximate location, profession, and demography,
- but the sources were only allowed to send the packets directly to someone they knew by first name"
- "each link was supposed to record, in the packet, details about themselves corresponding to those provided about the target, enabling the experimenters to track the progress of the packet and the demographic nature of chain along which it passed"
challenges in Real World Networks (c. t. p. 21)
- "social networks exhibit structural characteristics that are inherently nonlocal (Granovetter's 'bridges')" --> "no purely local analysis can predict their global statistical features"
- Analytical difficulties: "none of the work has been tested for large population size (n) with sparce connectivity under any but the most restrictive conditions"
- "no treatment has been given to the properties of continuous families of networks, whose structural properties vary all the way from one extreme to the other"
dimensions/ two relations of theory of social networks in Sociology (c. t. p. 21)
- "how 'far' each pair of vertices is from each other in the (unknown) metric of the (unknown) 'social space' "
- "whether or not they are connected and (perhaps) how strongly"
"Milgram's methodoloy (sometimes referred to as 'the smalle-world method')" ," 'random biased walk' in a network" p. 23
additional empirical challenges on page 23
"Most people seems to be quite poor at estimating their number of friends reliably"
definition of a 'meaningful' or 'substantive' contact or relationship
see sheet
topologically similiar
alpha-, beta- and ostrich-model are included in relational graphs (c. t. p. 42)
"highly clustered graphs with small characteristic path lenghts" (p. 42)
"is an attempt to investigate the generality of the phenomena observed for a the alpha-model, by removing any pretence of a social network, but spanning a similiar range of graph structures" (p. 42)
"is designed to represent the construction of a network in a fashion reminiscent of how a real social network is formed, that is, as a function of the currently existing network" (p. 42)
"is motivated by a desire to unify the observed properties of the alpha- and beta-models, in terms of a model-independent parameter ostrich" (p. 42)
ostrich: model-independent parameter
additional challenges. from Real World to a graph
"apparently no consistent and comprehensive method of characterising all human values, idiosyncrasies, and foibles that then aggregate to produce equally enigmatic human relationships" p. 43
challenge of creating a model: "to abstract the essence of the phenomenon to be described by stripping away detail without stripping away essential detail" p. 43
two generalisation (p. 43)
- "Assume that a network can be represented purely in terms of the connections between its elemets"
- "Assume that the likelihood of a new connection being created is determined in some fashion by the already-existing pattern of connections"
"apparently no consistent and comprehensive method of characterising all human values, idiosyncrasies, and foibles that then aggregate to produce equally enigmatic human relationships" p. 43
distinction between structures of Real World Networks
connected-caveman world
world Salaria
tendence: a -> infinity
tendence: alpha -> 0
a world that is "disconnected into many isolated 'caves' " with only some common connecting nodes/people between them (p. 44)
"influence of current friendships over new friendships to be so slight as to be indistinguishable from random chance" (p. 44)
inspired by a novel from Isaac Asimov "where future humans live in isolation and interact, via robots and computers, as readily across the planet as they do with their spouses" (p. 44)
scenario: alpha -> 0
"propensity of two unrelated people (which means that they are no mutual friends) to be connected is very small" (p. 44)
"they share just one friend in common" (p. 44)
"however, their propensity to be acquainted immediately becomes very high and stays that way regardless of how many additional mutual friends they may have" (p. 44)
"propensity to become friends against fraction of current mutual freinds, it would start near zero, rise very rapidly to some relatively large number (which is normalised to one), and then plateau" (p.45)
scenario: alpha -> infinity
"no one has much propensity to connect to anyone in particular" p. 45
"propensity versus mutual freinds curve would start near zero and stay near zero right up until the point at which all friends and mutual friends and then suddenly jump to one" p. 45
parameter of the mathematical formula for the vertex i's propensity to connect to vertex j (zero if they are already connected) (c. t. p. 46)
number of vertices which are adjacent both to i and j ( m i,j )
the averge degree of the graph; = average number of connections/edges of any vertex in the graph (k)
random probability of an edge (i,j) existing (p << (n 2) -1)2) (p)
tunable parameter to regulate between propensities for new connections (alpha)
additional explanation on p. 47 and 48
minimally structured p. 50
minimally connected p. 50
observations
Characteristic Path Length
smallest L with a small alpha (c. t. p. 49) at this point the whole graph is not completely connected
"L rises to a maximum, at which point the entire graph becomes connected, and then decreases with increasing alpha" p. 49
"decreases with increasing alpha" p. 49
additional diagram for alpha-graphs constructed on a ring substrate
Phase Transition (p. 53, p. 54)
low values of alpha (alpha<1) "L starts at roughly two-thirds the value of an equivalent 1-lattice (with the same n and k) and then irses in a distinct hump
high values of alpha (alpha>11), L is much smaller, and for alpha increasing much past 10
intermediate alpha, smooth transition from "big" to "small" graphs
Clustering Coefficient
" 'clustering cliff' occurs distinctly after the 'length cliff' " p. 58
"broad features of a clustering coefficient (alpha) are similiar to those of L (alpha)" p. 58
distinguishing between different structures of an alpha-graph
diagram p. 59
tree substrate can display organisational Real World hierarchies
"tree-based graphs are frequently encountered in problems to do with the lenghts of graphs and have substantial applications to social systems" p. 62
Cayley tree substrate
"once alpha becomes sufficiently large, it is no longer possible to distinguish the length of an alpha-graph built on a tree from that built on a ring" p. 62
concentration on Ring substrates argumentation p. 65
- important to have graphs that are connected for all values of alpha (for comparison of L or cc)
- all substrates qualitatively similiar L(alpha) curves
- allows for the greatest variation in L(alpha) over the full range of alpha in comparison to other substrates
- can compared well to non-substrate statistics
- for sufficiently high alpha, all differences between substrates are erased. indistinguishable results
"depends on preexisting conditions" p. 100
corresponding probability: "a function of the Euclidean distance between the vertices"
"different models of relational graphs can be unified by considering their dependence upon a model-independent parameter (ostrich, little omega), which quantifies the fraction of shortcut edges" p. 100
shortcut edges: "edges that connect verteices that would otherwise be widely seperated" // a slightly more general mechanism is that of vertex contraction, quantified by the parameter ustrich
"Relational graphs admit a particular class of graphs that exhibit characteristic path lengths approximately the same as equivalent random graphs (L - ln(n)/ln(k) ), but with much greater clustering" -> small world graphs (p. 100)
"exhibit a peak in their structural complexity (as defined by the average variation in the range of their edges) for omegastrich < 1, which lies in the small-world regime" p. 100
"different models of spatial graphs can be unified with respect to a different, model-independent parameter (big Eue), which characterises an externally imposed, spatial length scale, beyond which edges cannot connect" p. 100
shortcut edges: "connect vertices that would otherwise be widely seperated" (p. 71)
both: alpha and beta
new edges (p. 70)
"tend to form triads"
supersede a path with a length that was only two in the first place, as the shortest path between i and j
motivations p. 66
"properties of alpha-graphs near the alpha=0 extreme are dominated by the properties of the substrate upon which they are built" p. 66
"length of alpha-graphs are largely independent of the substrate chosen"
"no sociological apparatus required to this model, which is precisely the point" p. 66
"no talk of mutual friends or clusters of acquaintance circles" p. 66
"simply a perfect ring structure that, by virtue of a single parameter, metamorphoses into a random graph" p. 66
The Model
starting position (ß=0): perfect 1-lattice
with increasing ß: nearest neighbours get randomly "rewired to another vertex j" p. 67 (excluding self-connections and repeated connections); same with next-nearest neighbours
"intermediate cases (0< ß < 1) are less easily understood, but their interpretation seems much clearer than the equivalent graphs constructed using the alpha-model" p. 67
important for this process this the random number r. if r >= ß -> edge unaltered, if r<ß gets rewired (c. t. p. 67)
ß = 1: all edges are rewired randomly
APA for source material
Watts, Duncan J. (2018). Small Worlds : The Dynamics of Networks between Order and Randomness /. Princeton Studies in Complexity ; 9. Princeton, NJ : : Princeton University Press, .
literature beside the book
Albach, Michele H. (2014). Mapping the Interactions of the World: A Summary of Network Study and Application. University of Alberta.
p.3, about stoke-broker and experiment Milgram
Thiriot, Samuel. (2020). Small world is not enough: Criteria for network choice and conclusiveness of simulations.
small world can not be enhanced: "However, simulation of three models prove thateven networkshaving similar clustering, density, size and average path length may lead to qual-itatively and quantitatively different results." (p. 23)
lack of representativity: "results of simulations should not be studied in the spe-cific case of the network generated by one or two algorithms, but should beinterpreted in the whole space of networks that are assumed to be plausible" (p. 23)
criteria defined by the small-world phenomenon don’tconstrainst the dynamics enough for simulation results to be conclusive" (p. 23)
none of these algorithms is representative of the behavior of themodel in the whole space of small-world models: "Moreover, the similarity of results observed in some cases (spacesX6andX0for epidemics dynamics,X3for opinion dynamics andX6for Axelrod’smodel) when using Watts-Strogatz and Barab ́asi-Albert networks could confusemodelers, letting them belief that these results are representative of the modelbehavior, while our experiments clearly reveal important differences when ex-ploring other networks. " (p. 22)
summary: In this paper, we underlined a potential flaw in common practices in compu-tational simulation: many modelers argue that their simulations make sensebecause they use plausible networks, but actually study the dynamics of theirmodels over specific samples of these plausible networks. We first identified threepossible problematics related to this fact: (i) the possiblelack of representativ-ity of a generator to the class of networksof interest, (ii) the possiblelack ofconclusiveness of simulations over a class of networksand (iii) thepossibility torefine the criteria of network choicefor reaching (more) conclusive results. Weformalized these problematics using the concept of criteria of network choice,spaces of networks and spaces of dynamics. We argued that the criteria fornetwork choice should not only be based on the plausibility of networks butshould also limit the space of plausible networks enough for simulation resultsto be conclusive.We proposed an experimental protocol to tackle these three problematics,and applied it to the space of small-world networks, and the two Watts-Strogatzand Barab ́asi-Albert networks that are often used in agent-based modelling (p. 22)