The Big Picture

self-regulated learning

Theories of learning

Guy claxton

Basic skills

Dennis Likitty

Play based Inquiry based

Changing paradigms

Thomas

Ecology of giving

Positive Psychology

Restorative Practice

Making Meaning

click to edit

Benny and Spilly

Ecocentric

Social constructivism

click to edit

connectivism

participatory culture

click to edit

Social-emotional learning

Project based learning

authentic assessments

LORE

learning from country

wellbeing

epistemology

genetic epistemology

social epistemology

philosophical epistemology

what does knowledge mean/

how does one attain knowledge

what is the basis of true knowledge

justified true belief

justifed

evidence

empiricism

rationalism

true knowledge is founded on input from senses

beliefs are justified by experiences and observations

ideas and traditions are not the source of knowledge

reason is the basis for justifying claims and beliefs

logical mind is the course of new knowledge

research is verified by reasoning

click to edit

non-philosophical

formal epistemology

what is knowledge

click to edit

how do we know something is true

click to edit

bricoleur

incremental progress and striving to grow

Rhizomatic learning

acknowledge that learners come from different contexts, that they need different things, and that presuming you know what those things are is like believing in magic.

involves creating a context, maybe some boundaries, within which a conversation can grow.

Big Questions

why do we teach

what does succesful learning look like

what do successful learners look like

I teach to try and organize people’s learning journeys… to create a context for them to learn in.

how do we structure successful learning/

the rhizome pertains to a map that must be produced, constructed, a map that is always detachable, connectible, reversible, modifiable, and has multiple entryways and exits and its own lines of flight. (Deleuze and Guattari 1987, 21)

The rhizome is, in a manner of speaking, a kind of network. It’s just a very messy, unpredictable network that isn’t bounded and grows and spreads in strange ways. As a model for knowledge, our computer idea of networks, all tidy dots connected to tidy lines, gives us a false sense of completeness.

Workers take accepted knowledge and store it for future reference. They accept that things are true and act accordingly.

The soldier acquires more knowledge and becomes responsible for deciding what things are going to be true.

The nomads make decisions for themselves. They gather what they need for their own path. I think we should be hoping for nomads