Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

Tech Strat, :check:, ITSec - Coggle Diagram

- - - - Sai to help clear that SG can proceed. Also, SG can get ITSC approval without waiting fo Sep unfreeze :green_cross:
      - TH has manpower issue to support SG.
        Can TH legal allow for code share. Is the benefit of code share still good if SG goes for Pivotal ?
        
        Need to settle TH Legal to ensure we have access to TH source codes (for APIGW and ESB layer) :red_flag:
      - TCJ -> Kanags is ok to give his contact to have initial conversation
      - Have gotten support for Group EAS.But need to officially write to Peter & Kevin to get their support to dod this as GT Overall strategy instead of doing it for SG alone. At the sametime, SG's delivery timeline should be followed. Potential synergy are
        
        Code sharing as containers are highly portable
        
        Cloud adoption
        
        DevOps process alignment
    - - Pivotal
        
        So far any reason to kill pivotal ?? Say infra compatibility , ITSec adherence ?
        
        EAS std. Used by TCJ. Planned for GVP & Clicks
        
        Best compatibility for VMWare based hardware
      - Openshift
        
        More matured. Gels well on RedHat stack
        
        So far any reason to kill OCP?? Say infra compatibility , ITSec adherence ? Also OCP is moving away from Docker. Group EAS to advise if it is still ok to keep this option alive
        
        :green_cross:
      - Decided to with PAS.
        :check:
    - - No clear roles & rsp between Infra, Ops, BAU, ITSec are defined at group level yet. That means the current GPLC process is still used. This may slow down the DevOps benefits but can start with it
        :red_flag:
        Vinodh>> THIS IS IMPORTANT TO SCHEDULE WITH BAU, INFRA and VENDORS to clearly define the R&R.
      - Infra
        
        For TCJ, the infra team only provides the VMs. The IBGS team manages the container cluster. The application team deploys into the cluster . Understanding more from IBSG / TCJ on 01/June. ES connected IGSB, Grou Infra with SG INfra.
        Did the infra team further discussed and identified what are the taks involved to run the day to day ops. Do they have capacity/capability issue :red_flag:
        *Need Sai's help. Wee Yee raised that his team cannot manage the Infra Ops due to capability & capacity issues. We may need external vendor help by outsourcing. The cost can go up. Also Cloud discussion re-emerging because of this constraint :red_cross:* :red_flag:
        
        Talking to TH on 2/June. Vinodh is thi completed ? :black_flag: :check:
        Vinodh >> TH side reverted on the Infra queries. Most of the Infra duties are performed by Digital team, which we dont have here in SG.
      - Current ITSec process is followed. Hardened containers to be used. Containers are just seen as app servers