Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Indonesian Fisheries - Coggle Diagram
Indonesian Fisheries
McClean, Nick. (2017). Identifying key social and economic issues in Indonesia's archipelagic waters skipjack and yellowfin tuna fisheries: A scoping study.
Figure 1. Indonesia's Fishery Management Areas (Source MMAF 2014A)
FMA/WPP 713, 714, 715 underlined in red.
Mini-purse seine vessels account for the greatest number of jobs from vessels accessing the port by a long way, however the greatest number of crew per vessel is on P+L vessels. Furthermore, the HL fleet operating in Sulawesi Tenggara is undoubtedly vastly underrepresented in this table.
Vessels utilising Kendari Port, 2014 (Source PPS Kendari).
Duggan, D.E. and Kochen, M., 2016.
Small in scale but big in potential: Opportunities and challenges for fisheries certification of Indonesian small-scale tuna fisheries.
Marine Policy, 67, pp.30-39.
Table 3. An overview of the challenges and opportunities facing small-scale fisheries in terms of Fair Trade certification, MSC certification and traceability (IFITT).
Guardian Article Jan 2019
Guardian graphic. Source: IPNLF
Indonesia produces more tuna than any other country in the world with total landings of more than 620,000 metric tonnes in 2014, according to the latest data published by the Pew Charitable Trusts.
The majority of tuna landed worldwide is taken by fishing vessels using large purse seine nets to encircle schools of fish, primarily targeting skipjack and yellowfin tuna.
While purse seiners operating in the Indonesian economic zone are responsible for the biggest catches, their environmental impact is much greater than pole and line fisheries, which account for 50,000 metric tonnes a year, according to government estimates.
Song, A.M., Scholtens, J., Barclay, K., Bush, S.R., Fabinyi, M., Adhuri, D.S. and Haughton, M., 2020.
Collateral damage? Small‐scale fisheries in the global fight against IUU fishing. Fish and Fisheries
.
FIGURE 1 Proportion of small-scale fisheries to total fisheries of countries carded by the EU, listed by country income groups. The two numbers in square bracket denote the number of months a yellow card and red card were issued for, respectively, between 2010 and July 2019. (LIC: low-income countries; LMI: lower-middle-income countries; UMI: upper-middle-income countries; HIC: high-income countries)
Travaille, K.L.T., Lindley, J., Kendrick, G.A., Crowder, L.B. and Clifton, J., 2019.
The market for sustainable seafood drives transformative change in fishery social-ecological systems
. Global Environmental Change, 57, p.101919.
Fig. 1. The sustainable seafood movement’s model of change(adapted from MSC, 2018). In order to build the supply of sustainable seafood,fisheries that comply with standard are certified sustainable (step 1). Sourcing commitments by retailers and growing consumer preference for sustainable seafood build demand for sustainable sea-food (steps 2–3), which in turn motivates additional fisheries to become certified. Fisheries that already meet the standard can recruit directly into the certification program, while other fisheries may require improvements(step 4a). Fishery improvement projects (FIPs) can be used to facilitate fishery improvements, particularly in fisheries requiring significant change in order to meet certification requirements (step 4b).
Rochwulaningsih, Y., Sulistiyono, S.T., Masruroh, N.N. and Maulany, N.N., 2019.
Marine policy basis of Indonesia as a maritime state: The importance of integrated economy.
Marine Policy, 108, p.103602.
World’s comparative production in marine capture fisheries 2003–2012. source: FAO, 2014.
Full cited access docs:
https://www.scopus.com/results/citedbyresults.uri?sort=plf-f&cite=2-s2.0-84957589423&src=s&imp=t&sid=34cf3ff34f1f90a5dd8ab857b4b9662a&sot=cite&sdt=a&sl=0&origin=inward&editSaveSearch=&txGid=17c30531cbf35ef23535544ab6e4c891
Hoshino, E., Hillary, R., Davies, C., Satria, F., Sadiyah, L., Ernawati, T. and Proctor, C., 2020.
Development of pilot empirical harvest strategies for tropical tuna in Indonesian archipelagic waters: Case studies of skipjack and yellowfin tuna.
Fisheries Research, 227, p.105539.
Kimani, P., Wamukota, A., Manyala, J.O. and Mlewa, C.M., 2020.
Analysis of constraints and opportunities in marine small-scale fisheries value chain: A multi-criteria decision approach
. Ocean & Coastal Management, 189, p.105151.
Doddema, M., Spaargaren, G., Wiryawan, B. and Bush, S.R., 2020.
Fisher and Trader Responses to Traceability Interventions in Indonesia.
Society & Natural Resources, pp.1-20.
Willis, C. and Bailey, M., 2020.
Tuna trade‐offs: Balancing profit and social benefits in one of the world’s largest fisheries.
Fish and Fisheries.
Thomas Travaille, K.L., Crowder, L.B., Kendrick, G.A. and Clifton, J., 2019.
Key attributes related to fishery improvement project (FIP) effectiveness in promoting improvements towards sustainability.
Fish and Fisheries, 20(3), pp.452-465.
Penca, J., 2019. Transnational Localism:
Empowerment through Standard Setting in Small-Scale Fisheries.
Transnational Environmental Law, 8(1), pp.143-165.
Doddema, M., Spaargaren, G., Wiryawan, B. and Bush, S.R., 2018.
Fisher responses to private monitoring interventions in an Indonesian tuna handline fishery.
Fisheries Research, 208, pp.49-57.
Borland, M.E. and Bailey, M., 2019.
A tale of two standards: A case study of the Fair Trade USA certified Maluku handline yellowfin tuna
(Thunnus albacares) fishery. Marine Policy, 100, pp.353-360.
Hamid, A. and Wardiatno, Y., 2015.
Population dynamics of the blue swimming crab (Portunus pelagicus Linnaeus, 1758) in Lasongko Bay, Central Buton, Indonesia
. Aquaculture, Aquarium, Conservation & Legislation, 8(5), pp.729-739.
Hamid, A.B.D.U.L., Wardiatno, Y.U.S.L.I., Lumbanbatu, D.T.F. and Riani, E., 2016.
Stock status and fisheries exploitation of blue swimming crab Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus 1758) in Lasongko Bay, Central Buton, Indonesia.
Asian Fisheries Science, 29(4), pp.206-219.
McLeod, E., Szuster, B. and Salm, R., 2009.
Sasi and marine conservation in Raja Ampat, Indonesia.
Coastal Management, 37(6), pp.656-676.
Satria, A. and Matsuda, Y., 2004. Decentralization of fisheries management in Indonesia. Marine Policy, 28(5), pp.437-450.
Gillett, R., 2013. West Pacific East Asia Oceanic Fisheries Management.
Notohamijoyo, A., Huseini, M., Koestoer, R.H. and Fauzi, S., 2018. Trading-off pattern of marine stewardship council management in Indonesia. Competition and Cooperation in Social and Political Sciences.
Barclay, K., 2013. Transforming tuna fisheries in Pacific Island countries: an alternative model of development.
Bawole, R., Yulianda, F., Bengen, D.G., Fahrudin, A. and Mudjirahayu, M., 2015. Socio-Ecological System within Governance of Marine Protected Area: Case from Cenderawasih Bay National Park, Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 21(1), pp.19-24.
Policy Comparison- two ministers