Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
EVALUATION FRAMEWORK, ¿Indicadores?, ¿Metodología? , Definition of…
-
-
-
- Definition of challenges and NBS interventions
- Co-design of evaluation framework and KPI's
- Installation and testing of monitoring devices
- Pre-greening scenario (creating a baseline)
- Monitoring and evaluation plan
- Size/Scale of the intervention
- Baseline and boundary conditions
- Time frame
- Urban typology
Operability for monitoringDefinition of challenges:
- Human health and well being
- Sustainable economic prosperity
- Social cohesion and environmental justice
- Citizen security
Needs to address the different levels of interventions from specific projects at niche and local level to complex contexts. (Scalability)
-
Measurement of social and environmental impact is often difficult to be achieved with standard indicators. Quantitative and qualitative methods.
Sensors, multi-criteria analysis, modeling tools, community based monitoring, participatory approaches, group-based deliberation valuation, etc.
Aims at improving policy (design) definition and implementation through the involvement of stakeholders in the evaluation process
- Integrate evaluation within policy design and implementation
Evaluation as part of the design process. Should be coherent with the project stated goals: governance, environment, socioeconomic.
NBS en ciudades
Transformación del espacio urbano (environmental, social and economic)
- For better informed decisions and planning processes
- Helping to track the progress of NBS interventions over time
- Contributing to better reporting in cities
-
- Governance and stakeholder involvement
- Environmental resilience (eje técnico/medioambiental)
- Social involvement, health and wellbeing
Transforming current practices and contributing to a transition towards a sustainable and more equitable regime
Changes in governance emphasizing relevance, inclusive, and participatory processes.
Thematic Experts (local monitoring teams) that will provide quickly and assure a battery of commons KPIs in the project +workshops with stakeholders
- Use of theories of change
-
A roadmap for cities to:
- Define whether your work is contributing towards achieving the impact of CLEVER
- Clearly present and connect your work to the bigger goal
- Enable you to spot potential risks in your plan by documenting assumptions in each step
We should start identifying the long-term goals of CLEVER Madrid, then working on intermediate and short term outcomes and outputs.
What are trade-offs and synergies to biodiversity, health, economy, and community?
What is the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem services?
What are the immediate, intermediate, and long term?
NBS's have been designed for multipurpose?
How to involve stakeholders from planning administration and also residents?
Are benefits of NBS accessible to all residents?
What is the significance of displacement after green development (and mobility)?
How to communicate positive and negative effects of NBS?
City-wide or district-focused informal alliance of local and city authorities, community groups, businesses, academics to promote the NBS for regeneration or urban transformation, facilitate and drive the co-creation process.