Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
cAMP Signalling - Coggle Diagram
cAMP Signalling
-
-
PDEs
-
-
-
PDE4 is one of the most well studied PDEs and has widespread expression and ensures cAMP signals are brief as it is rapidly activated by PKA
Four genes provide genetic code for PDE4(A, B, C and D) and splice variants exist for each - small molecules struggle to differentiate between them but antibodies have been raised to do so
The variants are physiologically relevant though:
PDE4A5 signalling impairs long-term memory (Havekes, 2016, J Neurosci)
PDE4D7 can be used as a biomarker for prostate cancer outcomes (van Strijp, 2018, Prostate Cancer)
Masada, J Biol Chem, 2009 showed that PDE4 was driving the downstrokes in cAMP oscillations and that there was an optimal speed for oscillations
-
Drugs
-
-
Specific AC and PDE inhibitors as well as AKAP, assembly and targeting (such as palmitoylation) disruptors are future drug targets
Difficulty arises because modulating the amplitude/frequency locally/globally gives very different results
cAMP
Rapidly enhances L-type channel activity, slowly stimulates RyR synthesis and growth of myocytes.
All these different functions are kept in phase with each other
Activates PKA
-
Classic regulation pathway suggests that R-subunits sequester the catalytic C-subunits until cAMP binding frees the C-subunits
Recent evidence suggests that full dissociation may not always occur (when low [cAMP] are used and that the C-subunits retain some activity in this form (Smith, 2017, Science)
-
Pulsatile feedback
Can be achieved through Ca2+ inhibition (b-AR/AC5/6 - L-type Ca2+ channel drives cardiac contractions) (Cooper, Nature, 1995)
Recent experiments have shown how [cAMP] and [Ca2+] oscillations are regulated
Monitoring [Ca2+] has always been easy with fluorescent EGTA/BAPTA dyes
Tracing [cAMP] was very difficult and typically just resulted in a dose response curve until dyes based on Epac, PKA and CNGC were made
[Ca2+] traces showed that increased [stimulant] increased the frequency of peaks not the magnitude of them
-
CNGC sensors = use Na+ as a proxy, show [cAMP] at the membrane (only) and are rapid in response
Epac sensors = tagged onto the end of another protein so can be used to look at specific localisation
PKA sensors = originally had to be injected but can now be endogenously expressed, this is the slowest to respond of the three and the tagged PKA can reassociate with an untagged PKA module, sequestering it
These all respond in the physiological range because they are 'natural' targets
The first of these that was used was a PKA sensor (tethered to Z-bands with AKAPs) by Zaccolo & Pozan (Science, 2002)
Issue with this paper is that because the sensor was localised to the microdomains it didn't actually show that cAMP increased here relative to the rest of the cell
CNGC sensors were used by WIlloughby (2006, EMBO J) and showed that PDE4D and gravin were key - it observed PDE4, PKA and an AKAP regulating near-membrane cAMP dynamics
Cooper, 1995, Nature paper was key in showing that cAMP oscillations occur and that they are interdependent with Ca2+ oscillations
Diversity
AC subtypes (9 of them)
Could be three different AC subtypes on the three different faces of a cell (apical, basal, and facing other cells)
Expression shifts during development, e.g. hippocampal neurons are originally dominated by AC1 but by 14 days they have swithced to be dominated by AC2
First purified and clones 30 years after the discovery of the reaction because it is at such low concentrations difficult to solubilise
-
-
AC8 can associate with various proteins (such proteins were often initially identified using co-IP experiments
Actin cytoskeleton & NHE1 (indirectly)
SERCA, Dynein, Integrin, PP2A etc (directly)
Targeting of the targets of cAMP also controls how efficiently the downstream targets will be regulated
Chemotaxis
Rate of change in [Ca2+] is known to control sperm chemotaxis (Alvarez, 2012, J Cell Biol)
Trajectory correlates well with the time derivative of the [Ca2+] which led to Kaupp proposing a 'temporal model'
The N and C lobes of CaM have different Ca2+ affinities
CaM switching between the NTD and CTD of AC8 is associated with a change in affinities for Ca2+
Both of these are potential mechanisms to detect the time derivative of [Ca2+]
Forward movement of growth cones in exuberant retinal axons (Nicol, 2007, Nature Neurosci)
Ephrin causes withdrawal of growth cone and TTX blocks this, showing that the activity is dependent on Na+ channels (which are under control by AC-controlled Ca2+ channels)
Preloading with caged cAMP results in growth when challenged with UV light (even in the presence of TTX)
-
Was theorised that AC1 was at the front here stimulating cAMP peaks and hence EPAC-tagged AC1 could be used to measure the local, transient changes in [cAMP] (Averaimo, 2016, Nature Comm)