Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Law and Science in the Courtroom (Ethical Philosophy (Code of Ethics…
Law and Science in the Courtroom
Ethical Philosophy
Practical
Utilitarian
Consequences
Idealist
Moral Relativist
Actions and Participation
Code of Ethics
Choices
Risk Analysis
Risks/Sacrifice
Agency
Global
Individual
Ethics Proposal
Group Vulnerability
Research Risk
Participants
Self
The Court System
Inqusest
Informative
Collaborative
Recommendations
The Courtroom
Presiding Coroner
Coroner's Counsel
Persons with Standing
substantial and direct interest
Family Members
CPS
Ministry of Labour
Other people
Preventative
Mandatory
Discretionary
The Goudge Enquiry
2 Main Lessons
Dr. Smith Lacked Basic Knowledge
Dr. Smith did not stay within the limits of his knowledge
Trials
Criminal
The Courtroom
Judge
Trier of Fact
Jury
Witness
Lay Witness
bare facts of their experience
Expert Witness
Opinions
Professional Code of Ethics
Admissibility Laws
R v. Mohan
Necessity to Assist the Trier of Fact
Absence of other Exclusions
Relevance to the Case
Properly Qualified
Court Reporter
Clerk
Evidence
Confessions
Interrogation
Rapport Building
Non-Verbal Cues
Comparison to the Norm
The Eyes
The Mouth
The Arms
The Legs
Statement Analysis
The Mind of the Accused
Sentencing
Not Criminally Responsible
Unfit for Trial
4 more items...
Daniel M'Naghten Rule
1 more item...
Ontario Review Board
5 more items...
Psychopathology
Legal Liability
Mens Rea
Actus Reus
Forensic Utility
Risk
Rehabilitation
1 more item...
Psychopharmacology
Drug Effects
Psychosis
2 more items...
Toxicologist
3 more items...
Crown
Defence
The Accused
Civil
Plaintiff
Defendant
Justice
Wrongful Convictions
Eyewitness Identification
False Confessions
"Mr. Big" Operations
Unreliable Witnesses
Perjury
Jailhouse "Snitch"
Tunnel Vision
Faulty Forensics
Professional Misconduct
Exoneration
Appeal
Criminal Code s.696.1
Innocence Canada
Non Profit Organization that helps people wrongly convicted
Three Stage Process
Preliminary Review
Full Review and Investigative Stage
CCRG + Litigation
CCRG
Preliminary Assessment
Investigation
Report Written
Minister Decision
Order a new trial
Refer Case to Appeal Court
Dissmiss Application
New Matters of Significance
Not legally defined
Not Previously Considered
Relevant to Matter of Guilt
Case must be a serious offence
Homicide
Other Serious Crimes
Systematic Discrimination
Age
Race
Gender
Mental Health
Lingustics
governed by
separated into
concerned with
concerned with
helps us make
informs our
helps determine
informs how we write
concerned with
examines
risk to
risk to
examines
at various levels
employed in
separated into
further separated into
both can be
similar procedures in
adversarial between
adversarial between
can give
can only give
includes testimony from
professionals are considered
average people are
subject to
must follow
comes from a
Created after
if they are
the evidence must have
the expert must be
gathered from
verified with
involves
look at
lies are found through
used to make
meant to be
still done in
must have
can include
can include
can include
role of judge played by
Crown Attorney Role
attended by
can be either
made 169
can impact
applies
impacts
needs
requires both
looks at
impacted by
not supported by
looks at
which can cause
characterized by
explained by
other aspects explained by
looks at issues of
covers
commonly used in defence
different from
can be determined
determined any time between arrest and
does NOT include
accused
IS determined by
first appeared
stated that
influenced
decision goes to
consists of
goal is to
because of the
there are
example of a
goal is to achieve
can lead to
can result from
overturned through
can be done through
can go through
process includes
they will choose
includes
both require
they are
they have
a term that is not
includes
can come from
represents
must be
may recieve
including
Lillie Nadeau, #1005885179