Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Vallentine et al (2010) (A01 (Vallentine identified 4 themes within her…
Vallentine et al (2010)
Procedures/Interviews
-
Facilitators included nurse therapists and assistant psychologists. Senior clinical psychologists provided weekly supervisors.
-
-
Sample
-
The majority were diagnosed using ICD-10 as having schizophrenia, schizotypal and delusional disorders
-
Aims
The aim of this study is to determine the usefulness of psychoeducational material provided via groupwork for offender patients within a high secure forensic psychiatric hospitals
Results/Conclusions
-
-
-
-
Feedback from patients emphasised the positive impact of the intervention on their sense of agency and empowerment. Future research should focus on identifying the most effective way of targeting those patients who will benefit positively from this group and ways of relaying the information in a user-friendly format
Interview material
21 out of 31 completers, 7 patients had been transferred and 3 refused to be interviewed
A03
Strengths
- Interviews were recorded verbatim and extended group sessions
-
-
- Using thematic analysis rather than content analysis and open questions
-
-
-
Weaknesses
21 out of 31 agreed to be interviewed, 7 transferred and 3 refused
-
-
A01
The interviews were pre-arranged with patients, all semi-structured
-
Vallentine used semi-structured interview giving patients a chance to express themselves with follow-up questions
-
-
-