Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
EPQ Conclusion (Alternatives to NC (Effective regulation (prevent breach…
EPQ Conclusion
Alternatives to NC
Mobilisation
Effective regulation
prevent breach of thresholds
Elinor ostrum
8 principles for managing the commons
more reliance on self-governance
community driven action
National service
volunteering programmes to combat environmental destruction
Take a side
Natural Capital useful in short term
improve environment in a capitalist society
change behaviour
individuals
corporations
governments
farmers
Overarching issues of NC
moral questions should be answered
which stakeholders should make decisions?
how do we decide who should do the valuing and who's values should be taken into account?
Which stakeholders have the power to limit valuation to non- monetary values or to extend it to monetary values?
Do people who calculate monetary values for nature have the mental frame that is suited to environment?
What world do we want to live in?
Answer the question
Does it improve sustainability
PES
aids environmental protection to an extent
markets
potential to be distorted through subsidies
evidence of markets changing behaviour
increasing consumption and exploitation
accounting
ecological understanding
looking at stocks of natural capital buisnesses depend on
greater knowledge of the interdependacies between business and ecology
valuation
potential to change behavior through pricing and taxing pollution
cause a system change
treat nature as a commodity
splitting up parts of nature
whole is greater than sum of its parts
lack of knowledge of how ecological systems work
damage nature overall
unable to rebuild nature
privatization of land
NC a sustainable approach?
potential to meet the outcome of sustainability in principle - in practise this may not be so.
promotes debate around sustainability
may drive sustainable outcomes if we understand environmental thresholds and allow for NC to account for these