Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

Project 2: Benefits of Trophy Hunting (Damm, G. R. (2008): Recreational…

- - - - "Although the image of a dead animal may be distressing to non-hunters, well-managed hunter harvests are almost inconsequential from a biological viewpoint" (Damm 8)
        
        "Trophy hunting provides economic benefits beating those of conventional agriculture and thus could encourage biodiversity conservation" (Damm 8)
        
        "Yet even in those positive cases, the question remains often open whether the funding obtained
        through trophy hunting is being put to good use" (Damm 8)
        
        Vice president of CIC
        Has held many positions for CIC
        
        I'm going to the quotes above to compare trophy hunting to other acts of conservation. Also this article has inspired me to talk about how money made should be used
        
        Both articles talk about why it is economically good and good for conservation
- - - - "Trophy hunting makes up an estimated
        14% of the whole tourism industry in Namibia" (Humavindu 69).
        
        "It can be deduced that trophy hunting in South Africa generated about N$1000 million in gross output in 2000, some seven times more than our estimate for Namibia. South Africa’s gross domestic product (GDP) was 38 times" (Humavindu 68-69).
        
        The author he is a expert in conservation
        Also uses graphs and all the sources are journal reviews over either Nambia's economy or tourism.
        
        I plan to use this to go deeply in depth of one country in Africa and too show what trophy hunting can do for these companies.
- - - - "Without conservation hunting, these African nations will undoubtedly see human-wildlife conflict increase, a rapid loss of animal habitat to human activities"
        
        "a prominent study titled “The Conservation Equation in Africa” concluded that between the years 2012 and 2014, hunting for conservation contributed a staggering $426 million to the GDP of Botswana, Ethiopia, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, Tanzania, Zambia, and Zimbabwe"
        
        There was no author for this article but it is posted by the SCI or which is a credible organization that protects hunting rights.
        
        I am going to use this article to show the increasing number of species when the hunting programs are being used and used to correctly
        
        Both articles connect to each other by talking about how trophy hunting helps economy. The top article reviews Namibia's economy and the bottom article shows what would happen to these countries without trophy hunting
- - - - "Trophy hunting generates considerably more income per client than ecotourism" (Lindsey 44).
        
        Link Title
        
        Senior Research Fellow Mammal Research Institute University of Pretoria, South Africa Savé Valley Conservancy in Zimbabwe These were all listed under the authors name and at the start of the journal.
        
        I'm going to use these quotes to show how it can help stop poaching which is the real crime here and to show the hunting to money made is huge. Then I hope the graph is okay, it just shows each year and how much money each country is making
- - - - "this small, wealthy club of big game sport hunters do not embrace the values of the vast majority of other Americans who appreciate the many non-exploitative values of wild animals"
        
        "For example, a Synovate eNation poll in 2011 found that of those responding to its survey, 70.4% of Americans would pay to view lions on an African safari, while only 6.6% would pay to hunt them"
        
        It is an article by CNN so it is a known and reliable source
        
        I will use this article to gain credibility and also use there quotes to build my own quotes. Their quotes and article are very poor and will be easy to rip on.
- - - - "The country with the best track record for protecting the white rhino is South Africa, where 16,000 of the 20,000 live"
        
        "But the alternative to trophy hunting probably would be worse: The inexorable extinction of lions, rhinos and other magnificent beasts in the wild because few have the incentive to keep them alive"
        
        It is published on LA Times a reliable source and the author also wrote “The Human Christ: The Search for the Historical Jesus"
        
        This article was mostly about the rhinos and lions. Yet I found a good quote about how much money South Africa brings in and a pathos quote on what these allegations to ban trophy hunting are dumb.
- - - - " Zimbabwe also have sizable
        hunting industries, generating US$28.5 million/year"
        
        "Approximately 18,500 foreign hunting clients now visit sub-Saharan Africa annually,
        compared with 8,000 in 1990 (Roulet 2004), and generate approximately US$201 million/year"
        
        I am using a academic journal and I am using another source by this author
        
        I plan to use this to show the oppurtunites for trophy hunting and also showing more economical facts about it
        
        These articles are different but there are parts of the bottom of article where it states problems about trophy hunting.
- - - - "The number of illegal killings would naturally increase when removing the incentive for people to care for wildlife"
        
        "Dr. Dickman also notes the role that social media plays in creating a distorted image of trophy hunting to the wider public"
        
        It is posted by the CIC and is a review on a academic journal made by 133 scientists.
        
        It talks a lot what would happen with out hunting which I will use but the one thing that stuck out was the false story people see on social media.
        
        Articles both show why without trophy hunting most animals would go extinct