Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
18th Brumaire (Historical Material Analysis (Use of this exposes the…
18th Brumaire
Historical Material Analysis
Use of this exposes the structural limitations to revolution
Can identify some of them: list and explain how if room to do so
SOME universal truths to extrapolate for more universal application
the importance of the social. Cut ties with the past.
Fear. identifies.
Partial, but not necessarily more than that
Further develops nuance not seens in previous "more academic" works. Secondary to the primary purpose. E. P. Thompson continue to adapt your analysis.
Balance between Proudhon and Hugo's approaches. Use of quotes that he followed up with proving.
demonstrated how class struggle in France allowed a grotesque mediocrity to play the heros part" - from preface.
Ch 1 - longed to return to the fleshpots of history. weary of revolution. no new imagination beyond Napoleon
Criticism of not being empirical. Unfair standard. abides by its own internal logic. nothing unbiased about any framework
predicated on some big assertions. Proletariat can be only driver for revolution. one possible interpretation
paradox of state not reflecting the interests of bourgeoisie
aiming short of true revolution made regression nearly inevitable
Theatrical Motifs and Prose
Poetic, artfully done. Need for poetry.
the social revolution of the nineteenth century cannot take its poetry from the past but only from the future. It cannot before it has stripped away all superstition of the past
revolutions constantly criticize themselves. It has first to create for itself the revlutionary point of departure - situation relations, conditions under which modern revolution becomes serious
Uncovers curtain of mystery over the issue. Shows its not what it appears
Tragedy and farce in particular.
cutting descriptions
rhetoric acts upon the social statement he made.Layered approach.
his target audience. Accessible terms and metaphors
Application to modern era. social realm need not be divided. can act in multiple ways and not be hindered by 'proper' structure
Ties together as revolutionary historiography. Acting on it. Praxis
recent developments when writing. meant to be active participant
can't separate political Marx from historical MArx