Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Corporate Finance (Reading 33 (cost of capital)
Module 33.1
WACC (LOS 33…
Corporate Finance
-
-
-
Reading #31 31.2
LOS 31.g
Market and non-market factors that affect stakeholder relationships and corporate governance.
Activist shareholder: hold a significant number of shares ---> they can pressure the company to make changed they believe will increase shareholder value.
Proxy fight: Two parties fight over the proxy votes from other shareholders who are not going to vote by themselves.
Tender offer: The activist group publicly offer to buy the share at a specific price during a time window ---> In order to gain enough votes to take over the company.
Hostile Takeover: Go directly to the other company and replace their managers and boards of directors to get the take-over decision approved.
- Staggered Board Elections*: The board consists of directors who have different service terms (ex. directors elected last year cannot be replaced until next term)
-
-
-
-
-
LOS 31.k:
Negative screening: EXCLUDING specific companies or industries from consideration for the portfolio based on their practices.
-
-
-
Engagement/active ownership : Using Ownership of company shares as a PLATFORM to initiate or support positive ESG changes.
Green Finance: Producing economic growth in a more sustainable way -- reducing emissions, better managing natural resource use.
Green bonds: Bonds for which funds raised are used for projects with a positive environmental impact.
Overlay/portfolio tilt: Strategies used by fund and portfolio managers to manage the ESG characteristics of their overall portfolios.
Stock managers may seek to reduce the environmental pollution or carbon footprint of their portfolio as a whole.
Risk Factor/risk premium: Treatment of ESG factors as an additional source of systematic factor risk along with other traditional risk factors.
-
READING 32
Module 32.1
-
-
LOS 32.c
Effect of mutually exclusive projects, projects sequencing, and capital rationing.
- Independent vs. mutually exclusive projects
Independent projects: projects are unrelated to each other and if both are profitable, the company could accept both projects.
Mutually Exclusive projects: only ONE project in a set can be accepted and projects are competing with each other.
- Project Sequencing:
some projects must be undertaken in a certain order, or sequence, so that investing in a project today creates the opportunity to invest in other projects in the future.
Ex. profit phase 1 ---> invest in phase 2.
- Unlimited funds vs. capital rationing
If a firm has unlimited funds, the firm can undertake all projects with positive net returns
Capital rationing: Prioritize with standard of achieving the maximum increase in value for shareholders given its available capital.
LOS 32.d
NPV, IRR, Payback period, discounted payback period, profitability index
NPV: Sum of the present values of all the expected incremental cash flows if a project is undertaken.
For a normal project with conventional cash flows:
\(NPV = CF_0 +\frac{CF_1}{(1+k)^1}+...+\frac{CF_n}{(1+k)^n} \)
*CF₀ is negative --- initial investment
-
IRR: for a normal project, the IRR is the discount rate that makes the present value of the expected incremental after-tax cash inflows just equal to the initial cost of the project.
- \(PV(inflows) = PV(outflows)\)
-
Decision rule:
-- if IRR > the required rate of return ---> accept the project
-- if IRR < the required rate return, reject the project
-
- When IRR is less than the cost of capital --- NPV <0
- When IRR is larger than the cost of capital --- NPV>0
-
Discounted Payback Period: Use the present values of the project's estimated cash flows.
- Greater than the payback period without discounting.
-
mitigate one of the drawbacks of payback period, but still not address the issue of further cash flow. --- still as a measure of liquidity only.
Profitability Index (PI): The present value of a project's future cash flows divided by the initial cash outlay:
\(PI = \frac{PV of \, future\, cash\, flows}{CF_0} = 1+\frac{NPV}{CF_0}\)
PI is closely related to NPV: NPV is the difference between PV of outflows and inflows, and PI is the Ratio between outflows and inflows.
Decision rules:
- if PI>1, accept
- if PI <1, reject.
If PI > 1, then NPV > 0, and IRR > discount rate.
-
READING 32:
Module 32.2
LOS 32.f:
Contrast NPV decision rule to the IRR decision rule and identify problems associated with the IRR rule.
-When NPV is low but PI is high?
Choose the project with higher NPV --- because NPV measures the expected increase in wealth from undertaking a project. And the assumption in NPV that project cash flow can be reinvested at the discount rate is a realistic assumption while in IRR it is not.
-
LOS 32.e:
NPV profile, compare NPV and IRR methods when evaluating independent and mutually exclusive projects.
-
NPV Profile: A graph that shows a project's NPV for different discount rates.
- the discount rates are on the x-axis and corresponding NPV are plotted on the y-axis.
-
-
LOS 32.g
Relations among an investment's NPV, company value, and share price.
Theoretically:
A positive NPV project should cause a proportionate increase in a company's stock price.
Reality:
- Analysts believe in a lower NPV than announced ---> price fall
- Take announcement as other future projects, raising expectations ---> cause price increase much greater than the NPV would justify.