Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

Personality Judgement (Moderators of accuracy (Good information: High…

- - - - Accuracy increased dramatically between minimal/trivia stages and trivia/short unstructured stages
  - - - High observability: externally manifests traits like extraversion
      - Low observability: internally manifests traits like neuroticism
  - - - If judges make target comfortable around them, generally more the judgements they make are more accurate
      - Biases
        
        Fundamental attribution error: neglecting situational influences on behaviour, typically stronger when judging others than when judging oneself
        
        Egocentric standards: self is used as standard/norm for judging others
        
        In absence of relevant information people may assume others are like them and project their own personality onto others
        
        However, when we have evidence that others behave differently from us we exaggerate how different they are from us and attribute more extreme traits to them (we assume self is normal, other is extreme)
        
        Self-enhancement biases: Individuals are often motivated to view themselves positively on traits that have strong evaluative implications (e.g., vices and virtues)
- - - - Target must emit some kind of info that could help us figure out his or her personality
    - - Judge needs access to certain cues, which target may not show
    - - Judge needs to be able to detect cues, lots of factors like judge's state in the moment as well as biases can affect this
    - - Upon detecting the cues, the judge needs to be able to use the information in the right way to make a good judgement