Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
witchcraft - section c (science (copernicus (ideas (Heliocentric model of…
witchcraft - section c
controversial cases
the boy of burton
Thomas Darling as a teenage boy, who had previously been abused in prison, became ill and had fits. Blames on a witch.
The severity of the boy’s illness coincidentally worsened whilst he was in the presence of someone who was claimed to be the witch of Stapenhill - 60 year old Alice Gooderidge.
John Darrell was an exorcist and worked with William Somers. They accused 13 women who were all arrested, however their work was a set up. They confessed that he was never possessed by the devil and the fits he threw were fake and ordered by Darrell.
It made people in Burton and the Justice of the Peace realise that witchcraft may not have been as practised as all the claims had suggested. Due to the large numbers of false accusations.
the pendle swindle
Robinson brought up the issue of witchcraft in order to avoid the punishment of not looking after his father cattle (diversion tactic)
His father had forced him to tell the story, motivated by a desire for revenge for frances dickinson which whom he had entered the dispute over payment for a cow
Robinson noticed two greyhound dogs (one black and one brown) he became suspicious when a hare ran past and the dogs made no movement. From this he was startled to see that the black one had turned into Frances dickinson and the other ito a unknown boy.
-
Jane wenham
Gilson, a farmer, accused Wenham of cursing him when she was refused to give a small amount of straw.
prosecution
-
-
-
-
A Witness claimed to see Wenham flying, but he stated there is no law against it.
At this time, witchcraft was rare and securing a conviction was unlikely.
-
publications
-
Thomas Ady’s A Candle in the Dark, 1656
Samuel Harsnett’s A Discovery of the Fraudulent Practices of John Darrel, 1599
John Webster’s The Displaying of
Supposed Witchcraft, 1677
-
science
copernicus
-
-
lack of impact
He was forced to say his work was Platonic theory instead of Aristotelian fact, to avoid being accused of blasphemy, meaning he presented this idea as merely a theory.
His book ‘De revolutionibus orbium coelestium’ was banned, reducing impact - banning would have been much more effective than it is now due to the power of the Catholic Church.
kepler
-
-
lack of impact
Publishing: Mysterium Cosmographicum (cosmic mystery): asserted his strong religious faith insisting universe was perfectly designed by God
- If God exists, then the devil exists and witchcraft is “real”
- Kepler's mother was accused of witchcraft and was imprisoned
-
newton
-
-
lack of impact
-
Newton never explained why there was gravity- he simply came up with the equations for universal gravitation
Some of his work had been withdrawn in fear of backlash from the church and to avoid being condemned by the Inquisition
Most people were unable to understand his findings as they were written in a way no one without a good education could read
-
Went against the belief that God created everything in a fixed position therefore people were less likely to believe Isaac’s findings
the royal society
-
-
lack of impact
Work of the royal society would have had limited impact as they would only be known by the upper class members of society who were educated. However most accusations and witch crazes occured in areas of poverty by the uneducated mass.
Early Philosophical Transactions editions involved investigations into alchemy. This may have reduced their impact as although they came out new knowledge they were also in this way reaffirming belief in magic.
Furthermore Philosophical Transaction would have had a limited audience. It is likely that only people in london and with an education would have read it.
Members of the royal society still held the belief in witchcraft themselves. For example Glanville argued for the existence of witches.
However more social inertia for witchcraft. One king belief does not change the entire countries belief
-
-
-
-