Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Judgment as a faculty by which laws are prescribed a priori (Determining…
Judgment as a faculty by which laws are prescribed a priori
Thinking
The particular
as contained
under
The universal
Determining
Universal
The particular
Transcendental
A priori
Subsumption
Given
Understanding
:warning:
Manifold forms of nature + modifications
Laws furnished by pure understanidng
empirical
contingent
necessary
on a principle
Unknown
Unity of the manifold
Reflective
The particular
The universal
:question:
In need of a principle
Higher
Lower
Contingent
Given
The purposiveness of nature
The principle
Universal laws of nature
understanding
to nature
Universal concept
Particular empirical laws
left undetermined by these universal alws
A unity
an understanding (not ours)
supplied them
The benefit
our cognitive faculties
A system of experience
particular natural laws
An understanding
Not actually be assumed
An object
The ground of the actuality
End
The agreement
Constitution of things
Purposiveness
Of its form
The principle of judgement
The form of the things of nature
Under
Empirical laws
Purposiveness of nature
In its multiplicity
Nature
An understanding
The ground of the unity
The manifold of its empirical laws
Purposiveness
The purposiveness of nature
Only
Reflective judgement
Practical purposiveness
Human art
Morals
The principle of the formal purposiveness of nature is a transcendental principle of judgement
Transcendental principle
The universal condition
Things can become objects
Out cognition
A priori
E.g.
bodies--substances
ontological predicates
Pure concepts of understanding
changeable substances
The empirical concept of a body
The concept of objects
The pure concept of objects
Possible empirical cognition generally
Natural purposiveness
The principle of practical purposiveness
Determination of a free will
A metaphysical principle
The faculty of desire
Empirically
A faculty of desire
The rules
:red_cross:
what happens
How we judge
:check:
how we ought to judge
The possibility of an experience
:+1:
Necessity
The universal laws
apart from which
Nature in general
Cannot be thought
Formal conditions
All intuition possible
Judgement
Understanding
All change has its cause
Transcendental judgement
A priori
The condition of subsumption under the concept of understanding placed before it
The unity
Presupposed and assumed
A thorough going connexion of empirical cognition in a whole of experience
Human insight
Contingent
In the particular laws of nature
unity of law
The synthesis of its manifold
Intrinsically possible experience
Unfathomable
Still thinkable
A thoroughly interconnected whole of experience
Subjective principle
:red_cross:
A concept of nature
A concept of freedom
We must necessarily assume the presence of such a unity
Apart from any ability on our part to apprehend or prove its existence
Judgement as a faculty by which laws are prescribed a priori
The faculty
Thinking
The particular
contained under
The universal
Determining
Universal
particular
Understanding
Subsumptive
the general possibility of a nature
Empirical
Contingenet
Reflective
Particular
Universal
In need of a principle
Not from experience
All empirical principles
Under
Higher, likewise empirical principles
Systematic subordination of higher and lower principles
a law from and to itself
Adjusts itself to nature
contingent
universal laws
Particular empirical laws
And understanding
Supplied
Our cognitive faculties
Nature
An understanding
Ground of the unity
The manifold of its empirical laws