Contract Law
Step 1: Common Law or UCC?
Step 3: Interpretation - preference given to written or typed provisions using the ordinary meanings of words, and construed against the drafter if there is ambiguity. Refers to whether the parties intended the written contract to be the final discussion as to the specific terms
Step 2: Formation (note: do not perform this step if fact pattern explicitly states that a valid contract was formed.
Step 4: Performance
Step 5: Remedies
Third Parties come into play in three ways
Does the contract involve a transaction in goods?
No
Yes
Common law governs
UCC Art. 2 governs
real estate contracts
service contracts
Describe transaction in goods: it is the sale of tangible, personal property?
apply facts
conclude UCC applies
If the contract is a mixture of services and sale of goods, determine which part is the most predominant part of the contract and apply it.
If sale of goods predominate: Apply UCC
If services predominant: Apply common law
Step 2: Is one of the parties a merchant (one who regularly deals in goods of the kind sold or who otherwise by his profession holds himself out as having special knowledge or skills as to the practices or goods involved.
acceptance; mutual assent is determined when both offer and acceptance present
consideration: a bargained-for exchange. The promise must induce the detriment, and the detriment must induce the promise.
offer
No defense to enforcement
bilateral contract: both parties promises something
Unilateral contract: one promising party. For there to be a contract, the offeree must complete the performance enumerated
Exists when there was intent to enter a contract through a promise or undertaking
- Terms of the Deal must be definite and certain
- the offer must be communicated to the offeree, giving them actual knowledge of the offer
Termination strips the offeree of the power of acceptance and can be initiated by the offeror or the offeree
By offeree
rejection
By offeror: revocation
counter-offer: generally terminates the offer and creates a new offer
Conditional acceptance terminates offer; if language does match up, there is no acceptance. Known as mirror-image rule. DOES NOT APPLY IN UCC
Conditional acceptance under the UCC can constitute a legitimate contract. Occurs whena buyer places an order and the seller's acceptance is different or addresses terms not in the order. Called Battle of the Forms.
If buyer is consumer: additional terms treated as proposals
If both parties are merchants, additional terms become part of the contract unless
offeror objects in a reasonable time
additional terms would materially alter contract.
offer expressly limits acceptance to its terms
in the event the terms are different, the knockout rule applies and omits both the offeror's original provision AND the offeree's differing provision from the resulting contract.
Offeror can control method of acceptance by stating conditions. If contract is silent on method, offeree may indicate acceptance through starting performance.
If offeree accepts by letter, then changes their mind, whichever letter arrives first (rejection or acceptance) determines the contract.
UCC: new consideration is not required to modify sale of goods contract. Instead, a change is allowed if it passes the Good Faith test.
Common law: pre-existing contractual or statutory duty cannot act as consideration for a new promise: a new consideration is required
Detriment and benefit must have legal vallue
an act of forbearance by the promissee is sufficient if it gives the promisor a benefit
Promissory estoppel/detrimental reliance can be used as a substitute for consideration. Requires:
Reliance that is reasonable, detrimental, and foreseeable
enforcement necessary to avoid injustice
Promise
nondisclosure
duress
misrespresentation
unconscionability
Illegality
mistake of fact: occurs when both parties to a contract are mistaken about a material facts, making it voidable by the adversely affected party.
statute of frauds: requires a writing signed by the parties to be bound concerning:
mutual or unilateral
lack of capacity
mental incompetency
intoxication
Minors
service contract not capable of being performed within a year from the time of the contract
Real estate contracts
promise in consideration of marriage
Sales of goods for $500 or more
Promise to pay the debts of another (suretyship)
Only the party claiming a contract exists must show a writing signed by the defendant where the material terms of the contract are included.
UCC requirement does not look at the material terms, but rather if the contract states it is a contract for the sale of goods and contains the quantity of goods.
If only one party is mistaken, the mistake does not prevent enforcement of the contract
If the non-mistaken party knew or had reason to know abou tthe mistake by the other party, the contract is voidable by the mistaken party.
gap-filling provisions
parol evidence rule: governs whether the meaning of a document can be determined by the negotiations of the parties prior to the written contract. Admissibility depends on
Contract law supplies terms that govern where areas are silent, but can be overridden by being explicit in the agreement
UCC provides default terms for gaps in the contract
Warranties
implied warranty of merchantability: included in every sale of goods, because the goods sold must be fit for their ordinary purpose
implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose: generally accompanied by strange fact patterns. There must be a DIRECT representation by the seller or a representative of the seller that the product fits what the buyer wants.
express warranty: created by the seller. these become a party of the agreement if they are the basis of the bargin. Can be altered by explicit exclusionary or modifying language mentioning merchantability.
If contract includes expression such "as is" or "with faults" then that language is sufficient to draw buyer's attention to exclusion of the warranties
Course of dealing, course of performance, or usage of trade may also indicate a warranty is modified or excluded
If in writing, it must be conspicuous
UCC provides for missing terms such as price, time, and place of delivery. Does not provide for QUANTITY
Both the Common Law and the UCC terms include obligation of good faith and fair dealing
- What is the purpose for which the evidence is being introduced
- Does the evidence relate to a term or contract that is integrate
Merger clause: states that the writing is complete and the entire agreement of the parties
parol evidence is admissible if the purpose of the introduction of extrinsic evidence is to explain or interpret the terms of a written contract.
Parol evidence is admissible to supplement the terms of the written contract UNLESS the contract is completely integrated. Also admissible to contradict terms of the agreement unless fully integrated
Discharges the duty to perform by tender of performance and by a completed condition subsequent
Conditions in a contract can be
impossible
impracticable
frustrated
rescinded
also discharged if illegal
express
implied
constructive: can be
concurrent
subsequent
precedent
Breach: occurs after failure to honor duty to perform
in existence if both performances can be performed simultaneously
present if one's performance will take longer than the other
read into the contract by a court
Failure to fulfill a condition does not necessarily have to be breach, but it may relieve other party of performance
If breach is material, non-breaching party relieved of performance and is entitled to all available remedies
UCC
if breach is minor, offfended party entitled to damages
Buyers cannot reject after already accepting by inspecting and indicating goods do conform or by failure to inspect
Acceptance may be revoked if the goods are so defective that their value is substantially impaired.
If goods or their delivery fail to conform in any way with the contract, buyer may reject, accept, or selectively accept the goods.
pre-existing duty is abolished under UCC and is instead substituted by the good faith test
Equitable remedies
Monetary remedies
reliance damages
restitution
expectation damages
liquidated damages
restitution
unjust enrichment
specific performance: extraordinary, only available when monetary award would be inadequate to grant relief to the aggrieved party.
negative injunctive relief
Laches: When considering an equitable remedy, courts will consider whether the aggrieved party has clean hands or whether the party waited too long to seek recovery.
not usually available for
available for
real property
Unique objects
personal services contracts
contracts requiring ongoing cooperation between parties
through an assignment: a transfer of a right to receive a performance under a contract.
through delegation of the obligation
as a beneficiary
Do they have standing to sue the promisor?
Incidental beneficiary: one who benefits from a promisor's performance, but was not intended to be the one who benefits
Intended beneficiary: One who was intended to benefit from promisor's performance. May enforce the contract against a breaching promisor but have no rights against a breaching promisee in the event that performance doesn't happen
partial assignments are valid
Assignee may then enforce the contract again obligor
the owner of the right must maniest an intention to make a present transfer of the right
Non-assignable rights
those that are for future rights to arise under a future contract
illegal things
those that substantially change the contract's risks/duties
Delegation occurs when a 3rd party agrees to satisfy a performance obligation owed by one of the parties to a contract.
Does not relieve Delegator of obligation to the contract, remains liable for the performance unless there has been a novation
Novation: occurs when the obligee agrees to release the delegator in return for the liability of the delegatee
Non-delegable duties
Contracts that prohibit delegation
Personal perforamnce contracts where the recipient relies on the qualities of the party who is to render the performance