Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
David Yates ruined the Harry Potter movies (he ruins characters and…
David Yates ruined the Harry Potter movies
it is possible to make a good movie
chris columbus made a good and loyal movie
alfonso cuaron made the best movies and made good cuts
aesthetically the best
good cuts
same size as half blood prince
has the main points
he replaces good scenes with horrible ones
beginning of half blood had a good humour, which could easily bring a great comic relief, which brought in the book. But he replaced it with that horrible piece of garbage, who is not even funny and ruins both Dumbledore's and harry's character in the first minutes.
he has no vision for scenes who would be awesome cinematically
tony stark's funeral was a great scene, who is exactly what happened in Dumbledore's funeral. UnlikeJoe and Anthony Russo David Yates had no vision. The scene is emotion and has great comic relief, like I mean all I needed was grope in a suit, just give me grope in a suit
the quidditch cup in the books was sensational, if he did it in the movies it would show his and his team's potential.
he ruins characters and storylines
cho chang
greta gerwig is the living proof that you can transform a bad character in a good one, she transformed Amy March, someone who in the books was a undeveloped character into someone with a past and a story of overcoming her problems
David Yates not only didn't only miss this opportunity, he contributed to the fact that cho chang is cursed by the fandom, for being a human being.
lily evans
Snape's memory is a great disappointment to anyone who ever watched harry potter. The fact that harry was told all his life that he has his mothers eyes and that is extremely important for the book and in the end they are different, I MEAN, like what's different the SHAPE?
ginny Weasley
ginny Weasley was one of the worse decisions David Yates made. He took a symbol of feminism and transformed her into a plain character with no meaning