Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Public Funding of Art (Anti (Commercial art (No funding needed), Non…
Public Funding of Art
Anti
Commercial art
No funding needed
Non-commercial art
Attracting people
Supporting bussinesses
Funded by businesses
No public funding needed
Subsidy relatively new
Art already flourished before
no audience = no funding
Evidence
subsidies increase cost
Art linked to community
not bureaucracy
Anti
Art lucrative
.
Otherwise
Art not stimulating economy
Sufficient Demand?
Why supporting unpopular art?
Pro
Art pays for itself
driving businesses
Supporting small artists
Pro
Economic counter argument
Care for eldery
Not lucrative either
Tourism
Profit and jobs
e.g. Cultural buildings New Castle
2000 jobs
£1 investment --> £5 profit
Making tickets afforable